Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
"... main focuses of EU4."
yeah. we all know what you meant and if we can't laugh at silly mistakes like this, then the world becomes too sad.
They are advertising the game.
They are trying to build excitement, yet seem to be doing the opposite.
We have seen it before, hype it up to get the first sales, watch the numbers drop and move on.
You can call me negative or you can call me experienced, I dont really care.
Yeah, they aren't taking feedback on of basic mechanics. They have implemented a number of suggested map name changes, changes to cultural boundaries, and so on. Those matter greatly to some folks, but not me. None of them will impact the core gameplay.
I'm loving it!
It looks a lot like Johan's version of Vic 3 but set in the wrong time frame.
I have a lot more faith in Johan to make a good game than Wiz but I;m really not sure that Vic 3 Universalis is something I want to play.
Indeed. The most I'll ever say about a game prior to actually playing it is that it looks promising and I might enjoy it.