Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Portuguese mercenaries in Ethiopia without opposing Ottoman forces aiding Adal would likely mean a much stronger and more unified Horn of Africa, whilst Persia would probably be able to unify much of Mesopotamia and Central Asia and contest the growing power of the Mughals to their east, squeezing them against the Indian kingdoms.
The Mans aren't here to block trade to India and China, so Portugal and Spain have no need to round the cape. Or go west in an attempt to reach India, because what they're searching for is readily accessible.
It seems like the AI isn't very good at "What ifs" as it's only really trained on what *happened*
Besides, as demonstrated by Magellan a little later, it isn't the practicality of the expedition: it is the glory associated with it.