Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That doesn't always work, though, even at +200 relations. Look at the positives vs negatives that the OPMs already have, and add 1 for every 10 relations points you can get with them... If it goes over 50 they'll accept, so you should start improving relations if you can do that.
I imagine it's technically possible with a theocracy, but I certainly haven't managed to scrounge up the 100 positive points required.
You can also try to beat OPMs out of other HRE nations. I'm not sure if there's a way to ensure they become republics though - I always end up with monarchies, even for ones that used to be republics.
This is a bit stupid. A -25 for monarchies and -50 for other regimes would be less annoying, as you can usually get +25 with OPM that really like you, without having to get an alliance and all that. Anyway, I converted to protestantism and gave the emperorship to some other poor sob. Have fun dealing with this, punk.
Haha, that's similar to my current game. I didn't start as the emperor but I accidentally got elected - I basically just revoked the free cities (... Hard to take the bloody bastards over), spent IA for some relations boosts and handed it back over to Austria.
You get IA from free cities, but no one provence nations want to become a free city. Because which opm would want the protection of Austria from their neighbours, they are monarchies after all. :D Makes no sense, they should WANT to become free cities. Not that the emperor should increase relations and diplo just for the chance for them to say yes.
Having less princes and heretic ones hurt IA, but releasing nations or making them become the true religion doesn't actually give you much gain apart from a 0.00001 point count per month. If they thought you could too easily gain points before, just reduce the bonus you got (they basically did, but it's next to nothing now) Hell, even a 1 point IA bonus for doing these things would be an improvement.
You don't even get the nice event for getting Holstein back in the HRE. :(
Agreed. I have no idea how you can form the HRE now. Playing as Saxony with influence and its already good diplo bonus, I couldn't even pass the first reform in 50 years. And that is while constantly releasing annexed princes. Unless you conquer Russia and Poland and add all those provinces to the HRE, I couldn't see myself ever advancing through the HRE reforms, hence why I gave up on being the emperor, as it seemed more of a hassle than anything.
I'm glad I got the form HRE achievement before these changes. It's doable now that's not the problem, but much less fun (not "easy" but less fun/entertaining/drag/less boring)
I had the +1 dip rep ideas, and even then still I had to up relations. It usually worked right away right after releasing a nation as they like you a lot at that moment.
The problem is still that I'd think they want to become free cities without me having to 'coerce' them. Despite being a monarchy or having a militaristic leader or liking you at all. How many times do you see a nation saying no to becoming a free city, only for a few months later to be gobbled up. What possible reason could they have to NOT want the protection of a bigger nation?
They should jump at the chance, especially if they don't like me as I'd have to go to war for them if they get attacked.
At the same time I think that the emperor should get a special CB when a free city is annexed so that you can release it as a free city/republic. It doesn't make much sense that a country which had the word "free" in its government form is released as a duchy.
Princes that dislike you never call you up for war and thus get swallowed. Princes that like you never get attacked, unless you do ridiculous things like disband your army to look weak.
But usually even that is not really necessary. Everybody is allied to everybody in HRE, plus heretics naturally tend to ally one another. It's just a question of finding a way to get close to the target prince's allies. Based on my current game, if you border half of the princes you can get into war with almost everybody. It's also very usefull if the heretic prince is a free city (iirc you get -3 stability for declaring on free cities). For example, I needed to convert Frankfurt and Lubeck but didn't have border with either of them. Both of them were allied to Bremen with whom I didn't have border as well but it was allied to Friesland with whom I had a border. So I fabricated a claim on Friesland, declared war, made Bremen co-belligerent and voila I converted both heretics in that war without losing stability.
Usually it's not advisable to capture anything in the HRE if you care about reforms (because AE penalty is huge) but if you can get a border with 3-4 princes it can be worth it. Finally you can get an imperial liberation CB if a target refuses to return the territory but you shouldn't use it too much since it decreases IA by 1.
You get 0,004 IA per month for releasing a prince and 0,01 for Converting a heretic. As an emperor France and Poland are your worst strategic enemies, why would you ally them? You always get called to wars if an outsider attacks a prince. If you have high enough opinion of many princes you can get into most wars by enforcing peace, warning helps as well. If it's not enough just keep track of who was annexed and constantly go to wars to release them.
As the greatest Austrian in history put it (it was either one of the Holy roman Emperors or Arnold Schwarzenegger, I don't remember): "You can have results or excuses, not both!"