Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Facts are, the Ottoman Empire facilitated in many of the exchange of ideas happening in the Mediterranean during the time. Greece and Italy were *actually* catching up to advances that were coming from the Muslim region, which had generally been more scientifically advanced than Europe.
The Renaissance was more than just an "Italian" thing and (shock) included more than Europe. Another fact (I mean, who knew facts existed? I know you dont!) is that this gradual spread of ideas didn't even make it to most of Europe for over a century!
OMG, the absurdity of it all!
I hope that doesn't tarnish your video-game, viking "strong", fantasy world view of real history.
I mean...education...rough.
To be fair, the Islamic golden age ended with the fall of Baghdad to the Mongols, a while before EU4 begins.
But yeah, the early period of EU4's timeline is the historical high point of the Ottoman Empire, both technologically, culturally and militarily. Frankly, if we're going by real history they shouldn't even need the renaissance, as they rule constantinople (the greatest repository of classical learning in the world, and arguably the reason why the renaissance happened at all) and have access to the centuries old arabic translations of and commentaries on ancient Greek texts which were only beginning to circulate in Western Europe at the time.
Given that you've described Islam and the renaissance as "ideologies" though, I probably shouldn't expect much.
Poltical Correctness rewriting history for feels with a heavy dose of snark.
I wouldn't sign that the ottoman empire started or caused the rennaisance, as that is a bold statement indeed. "Ottoman rennaissance" is probably a bit...well, let's call it difficult, as the ideas did indeed spread mostly from northern italy and "european" (for a lack of a more precise term due to space and motivation) thinkers surely add those original thoughts, art and inventions that characterize the epoche.
However, ignoring the influence of arabic thoughts on said events simply labels you as ignorant.
One important thing to remember is that greece, nowadays acknowledged as "european", had far closer ties to the arabic world than towards middle europe for most of its history. The rennaissance understood as a rediscovering of ancient greek and latin literature was therefore heavily influenced by ideas and concepts that originated in muslim countries. Different Muslim countries btw. as the idea of a "Muslim world" vs. the "western" or "christian world" is, despite several hundred years of war and crusades, a concept that wasn't really established until much later.
So, as I said, it might not be the best idea that the rennaissance happens in Byzanz. However, it isn't that far-fetched as you might think. Otherwise, please keep your hatred and modern-day prejudices to yourself and pick up a history book (or at least consult wikipedia).
Many technologies of that time are lost today.
The correct recipe for Greek Fire for example is lost forever.
Then we have the funny copycats they have made.
The new name for Ouzu is Raki or Gyros is now called Kebab.
Not to forget that it was a hungarian traitor who made the cannons to conquer the Eastern Roman capital. Mercenaries of the crusaders have looted the city, killed countless people and destroyed most walls a few years before but why should the kebab propaganda care about such an important fact?
It can be explained in game, if you have a problem with it, then complain that anatolia has too much development in game, not "because they are muslim" because that's just troll bait.
To be frank, you're not acquainted enough with the Renaissance or even what an ideology is at present.
Allocate yourself plenty of time for homework on the subjects and get busy expanding your understanding and perception. Its the perfect remedy for mis-guided pre-conceptions.
Could you name any muslim sientist or artist of Michelangelo's level who made compareble impact on human's culture? And maybe you could name any example of secular muslim authors of early Renaissanse like Boccaccio, Dante or Chaucer? Golden age of eastern poetry traditionally ties with Middle Ages and there weren't a quality jump in New Time as opposed to European culture, art and science.
The Renaissanse institution should illustrate that quality jump which hadn't happenned outside of Europe.
The Ottoman, Safavid and Mughals, for example, all sponsored artisans to create literature, art and architecture that would be the envy of any budding European Renaissance princeling.
To consider the developments of stated time in polemic and binary terms is to ignore the diversity of both Muslim and Christain states, their economics, culture, enemies and friends. There was then, as now, no actual hemogenous Christian or Muslim worlds.
Thinking about it constructively though, perhaps a more pertinent institution would be Merchant Banking. Its adoption and evolution in Italian city states and subsequent spread around the Med, gradually finding its way North to areas such as the Netherlands, was far more important as an underpinning of Western European states'(concurrent with New World discoveries and explotation) economic successes and the increasing power shifts in their favour.
It is there that the importance of Michelangelo emerges from its seclusion in hallowed halls such as the Vatican, as part of a "cultural" lexicon worn by conquerors defining "human culture".
I agree.
I think "institutions" is closer to how cultural ideas actually spread - prior to this as Ottoman you eitther had capture and to hold Prague or Vienna or fall so far behind in tech you could then "Westernise" whch was basically treated like a religious civil war. But the game conceptually followed the idea that Europe was creator of all culture -ie the Ottomans got better tech because they captured a European city.
It's less about conquest and more about procimity and contact and the flow of ideas was 2 way.
This article is fascinaring both in the suprising place coffee held in the Arab world and its effects outside and how cultural ideas can spread by osmosis-
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-22190802