Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The reason I don't want to use Windows, Apple, or Google or whatever is that I oppose all companies on ideological grounds, so I am boycotting them all. Plus Linux is free and open source, which are more pros in my opinion.
Also, this might be some fluke, but I find games run smoother and faster ever since I switched to linux. And it probably isn't a fluke because the Linux distro I switched to only needs like half of the CPU requirements that Windows 10 needs: so the OS itself is actually much less resource intensive than Windows 10, which allows me to run games that I wouldn't otherwise be able to if I had windows 10(unless I upgraded my ram and such). So switching to Linux allowed me to run games that I wouldn't otherwise be able to do unless I upgraded my hardware.
I doubt that. Do you have a source that indicates speed 5 goes as fast as your PC can handle?
Because with Stellaris I'm able to make speed 5 go faster with that command I mentioned earlier and I never experience any crashing, or really any issues with that command except if I go above "ticks_per_turn 10" which it was originally configured to go "ticks_per_turn 1", so I'm able to make stellaris on speed 5 go 10 times faster without any problems. And stellaris has higher cpu reqs then EU.
Though, of course, I am comparing Stellaris with EU, which could be compariing apples to oranges if it's the case that one of them has speed 5 go as fast as your pc can handle and the other limits it. Perhaps that's the case.
Note: also you might want to check out the last paragraph that I wrote to Maximum good ol' rub directly above this comment. That might be why EU4 does not run the maximum speed my CPU can handle since it might think I need different system reqs than I really need to run EU4, but that's just my speculation at this point.
thats going to be on paradox. apparently they are going full in on 64 bit next patch, and didn't throw out a linux disclaimer (that i saw anyways) so i guess we get it then.
to be completely fair in absence of complete knowledge, the executable might be 32 bit and is calling something that in fact runs in 64 bit.
in the grand scheme of things though, i don't really think that 64 bit would change anything dramatically. as it is, on speed 5 now as persia in 1530, the game takes about 1.5 gigs of RAM or so, but the average load was about 1.6, meaning the CPU is overloaded, and not a RAM limitation where 64 bit really matters. i'm using an i5-4690k; not a beast by any means but not exactly low end either.