Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I recommend learning the game as either Castile or Ashikaga.
Castile: Colonise the Americas and fight small wars against natives. Merge with Aragon and you're nigh unstoppable in Europe.
Ashikaga: You're the Shogun. All your Daimyo are weaker than you and loyal to you. You can quickly learn diplomacy and fight small wars. You're also isolated to Ming nor Korea or anyone will bother you. You can also choose to colonise Oceania and North America easily.
That i have to disagree with. CK3 is in my opinion the best game for newcomers in this kind of genre. Expansion is incredibly easy and even the roleplay aspect of the dynasties is rather negligible.
Just push some buttons to gain gold, prestige and piety and use those to build an army and pay for CB. Battles can be won by just having a bigger army than the enemy and you can chain wars after wars because AE is non-existent. Give the land to your vassals so they have to manage it. The vassals even fight wars on their own and expand for you (which i hate). You can also spread your religion super easily because you can force it on everyone who has a high positive relation to you (which is easy to achieve with "money for relations" skill) and they even convert their land to that religion.
Its super simple gameplay compared to EU4.
Have to agree, difficulty was a major victim of the changes from CK 2 to 3. You didn't even mention the magical teleporting troops and walking on water...
I personally find it more challenging than CK2 or Stellaris as well.
vs. CK 2 is a lot about who you are playing in each of the two. I generally don't play post 1.9 Stellaris so can't really say about the current version but 1.9 with some decent mods was actually not terrible for difficulty.
Guess it's off my wishlist, then. The RP was the entire point, if I wanted to play a map-painting game, I'd play something else...
Hmm. I mean, you can still focus on the roleplay aspect, there isnt a need for map painting. But if you would go map painting, then yeah, its too simple. Let me say it like this, its by far not a bad game, i dont regret having bought it. But i regret having played it like EU4.
Nah, not my style, in the end. And, I don't do YT or any other sort of streamers, I'm a bit of a caveman in that regard :)