Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
He did quite a bit of good for Russia actually, despite his occasional insanity and fairly frequent brutality.
That moment when Russia freed the slaves before America. It really wasn't, not until mass industrialization at least. Catherine the Great in the 1700s toyed with the idea but decided not to after the peasants joined with a cossack who was pretending to be her former husband and former Tsar. Rebellion probably made her think twice about freeing them.
I know, I was making a pun. :) His early reign was rather effective although his wars were abject failures. However, he got quite tyranical after that and he started enforcing what would become one of the most brutal kind of serfdom in Europe. It was almost as horrible as slavery in fact since, unlike serfdom in the West, peasants could be bought or given as gifts even at the cost of separating famillies which the church denounced, but mostly in vain. But as for violence, it was mostly directed at boyars and not so much against the ordinary people.
Yeah, although it was initially in her program, she didn't free them mostly because she knew the aristocrats would turn on her and she needed them as officers in her army and as bureaucrats. Serfdom was only abolished by Tsar Alexander II in 1861, curiously at the same time that the US Civil War started largely because of the abolition of slavery debate.