安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
- Do you plan many conquests? Or are you content with Italy (and maybe some more provinces around the Mediterranean)?
- Do you like to play with subjects?
- Do you want to dominate the Mediterranean Sea or the coasts around it?
- Do you want to colonize mid/lategame? (Earlygame is probably not an option for the Papal States)
- Do you want to use (or even rely) on Mercenaries? Do you want an extremely strong army or an army just strong enough to achieve your goals?
- Do you want a strong fleet?
Who the fk would pick economic in Singleplayer...? In ITALY...?!?
i do, why, is that a matter to you ?
Anyone. I pick economic ideas in every game I play. Usually my first idea if im not Castile or Portugal.
Not anyone. Economic is an ok group if you're playing tall, but not if you're a serious blobber. Blobbers like myself prefer Administration, Diplomacy, Influence, Religious or Humanist, and Exploration/Expansion (for colonial powers). I find that boosting my economy through conquest is far more cost effective than boosting it through the Economic idea group. Trade is another favorite--even with TC's and colonial nations, I can always use more and better merchants. Economy just doesn't cut it compared to those.
Depends on the run & goals maybe? If your goal is to get tons of money through trade and production the policy with trade-ideas is alright. But if you play a nation with gold-mines, especially several, that inflation reduction alone makes it worth it.
But anyway screw meta... Just pick what sounds like fun