Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2178370821
My colonists always find absolute garbage too.
[Edit: This does not work]
Thats actually a really good strat - no idea why i havent thought about that yet
Well for one thing it also causes other colonies to yoyo which can result in completely wiping one out and wasting all the time spent sending the colonist...
...which absolutely matters if you ♥♥♥♥ around with your colonies.
Gambler's Fallacy.
America is garbage for trade. India, Africa, East Asia and SE Asia are so much better. In my most recent France Game, and probably my most successful game ever, I colonized most of Southeast NA and is gave almost nothing due to my stupid subjects whining about tariffs and expensive wars defending my territory from Spain, England and Scotland of all places. So I dropped the tariffs and started putting my full focus on Africa, fighting easy wars in the ivory and grain coasts against Spain, which got me a monopoly on the African slave and ivory Trade. Then I began conquering small nibbles of India and colonizing parts of Indonesia. By 1700 my colony in America owned the entire LOUISIANA TERRITORY, yet only made maybe 50-60 ducats monthly. By then, I owned the entire Deccan Plateau, the majority of Malacca and the Muloccas, the Philippines, the majority of Canton and most of South and East Africa as well as Mali. I set up maybe 5 trading companies and hopped all my trade to champagne. It made me around 500 - 600 ducats a month.
With those fat stacks of cash I was able to find expensive wars in Europe, against Austria, Spain, England and the countless alliances in Germany. By 1780, I owned all of the French mission territories, Rhine, Belgium and the Netherlands, all of Italy, and even parts of Venice and Bavaria. I was also in an alliance with the Ottos and Russia, since I turned France into a pure Protestant empire. Catholicism basically died in that game, limited to spain and England, who didn't anglicanize. At that point I ruled the world with alliances and I did what Napoleon failed to do: play chicken with Europe and win. I beat a coalition with Austria, Prussia, Russia.(who rivaled me beforehand) Britain, Spain and a horde of German princes with my army of 800k.
Suck It Napoleon.
One should know that.
And that's why colonies in America are poo.
Cant you just reduce maintenance? Haven't toyed with colonies for quite some time but doesnt 0 payment mean a negative growth rate? Thus not triggering the colonist leaving/arriving revolt trigger?