Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
there's probably a reason why the historical Enrique was nicknamed "el impotente" :)
there were also rumours that he was homosexual (his father, too).
of course it makes sense for a monarch to make sure the bloodline survives, but that doesn't mean that the actual person is interested in fulfilling that duty. they're only human after all. people don't always act reasonably.
That’s the Emperor DLC if I’m not wrong
Might be Rights of Man, from what I can see. I don't have either.
RoM lets you disinherit; Emperor lets you introduce a heir.
I love Paradox. Hey, you want to clean up the mess of a leadership you start with? Buy 2 DLC's.
I will say that Rights of Man is one of the best DLCs.
Emperor? Not convinced as yet. Still some clean up needed.
If you fall into PU and fight for your independence, you'll change dynasty too, anyways. So this saves you that war.
That would depend on the involved countries' respective prestige and diplomatic reputation.
Back when I was learning the game I switched through three dynasties via RM in 10 years by virtue of utilizing warrior kings a bit too much.