Europa Universalis IV

Europa Universalis IV

View Stats:
Good version of EU4 to play without any DLC?
I've heard that many DLCs made the game harder or dumber if you didn't have the DLC. I pretty much have no DLC and I was wondering what was a good version of the game to play.
< >
Showing 16-30 of 31 comments
Originally posted by MAKAVELI ELITE:

The game should be playable without DLC. Are you saying the gamemakers are crooks?

Maybe...

Look OP, I'm not saying the game isn't fun. But if you don't want to buy a minimum of 3 DLC, jsut don't get this game at all. For all the people who say the communcity is addcited to DLC features, I've played vanilla first.
Last edited by tiberiansun371alexw; Jun 25, 2017 @ 8:53pm
Laladen Jun 25, 2017 @ 8:34pm 
Saying it over & over does not make it true.
Steam's quotation system is kind of stupid
kaiyl_kariashi Jun 25, 2017 @ 9:09pm 
And i started playing vanilla just because I got tired of hearing it and decided to put it to the test.

Since Common Sense I've split my EU4 block between Achievement/dlc runs, and playing vanilla to learn how the mechanics have evolved as well as find areas people claim are problems and see if there's any truth to it.


I'm 100% convinced that any issues they're having is simply being unable to adjust to the new systems.

In general I've been extremely impressed with how far the core game has come a solid product for a newbie to cut their teeth on, especially since pre-AoW I was actually in the "this game needs dlc to be good" camp.

But that EU4 was a MUCH different EU4 than the game we have today.
Laladen Jun 25, 2017 @ 9:14pm 
Originally posted by kaiyl_kariashi:
And i started playing vanilla just because I got tired of hearing it and decided to put it to the test.


Good idea actually. I will give a vanilla game a go myself.
tonypa Jun 25, 2017 @ 10:29pm 
1.22 vanilla game without ANY DLCs is perfectly playable, as long you are not going for every achievement and attempting to play as extremely small and poor country. You can obviously play as small and poor country in vanilla 1.22 too, you just probably will not survive very long.

People use old versions quite a lot because these have bugs they can exploit to do difficult achievements.
Last edited by tonypa; Jun 25, 2017 @ 10:30pm
watery ketchup Jun 26, 2017 @ 9:51am 
Too bad Paradox doubled the prices for the steam sale.. :(
♠.brT Jun 26, 2017 @ 11:50am 
Originally posted by Lonnie Johnson - Soaked Again:
Too bad Paradox doubled the prices for the steam sale.. :(

they didn't double the price for the steam sale, they doubled the price as a matter of their pricing policy, this was going to be definitive but due to the outrage that resulted from the price increase PDX changed their minds and will rollback the price back to what they were before the increase, (paradox can't reduce the price now, because that would require removing all paradox titles from the steam sale)
yyyyzryrd Jun 27, 2017 @ 12:11am 
Originally posted by ♠.brT:
Originally posted by Lonnie Johnson - Soaked Again:
Too bad Paradox doubled the prices for the steam sale.. :(

they didn't double the price for the steam sale, they doubled the price as a matter of their pricing policy, this was going to be definitive but due to the outrage that resulted from the price increase PDX changed their minds and will rollback the price back to what they were before the increase, (paradox can't reduce the price now, because that would require removing all paradox titles from the steam sale)
Their pricing policy which makes no sense. They claim "inflation" and alike. But in reality, really? Really? Are you really buying inflation?
Trust me, inflation does not work as harshly as in EUIV. At least for modern countries.

Paradox deservrd the outlash they got, since it's a huge ♥♥♥♥ move upping the price on a game which is certainly not new at all. I'm not sure if a Paradox game has actually lowered price in recent years. Soon, people will just not be able to pay so much for older games. Old games are suposed to cost less because they are old technology, and obsolete. It has happened with just about all old games, and it's not even worth debating it will not happen to Paradox games.


As for DLC; pricey. Super pricey. A good amount of DLC is just useless. Others are pretty much just needed. For a good, full run, they are just needed. For some achievements, it's impossible to play high if you are unable to develop or alike. Non-DLC makes the game less skill based, and more luck-based. Seriously, how you gonna get 10 ducats a month starting off as an OPM?Unless in Germany, it's gonna be luck-based.
I'd buy some DLC if it was not so pricey.
neofutur Jun 27, 2017 @ 3:49am 
the oldest one that still allows achievements.
equinox1911 Jun 27, 2017 @ 4:10am 
What a bunch of BS in this thread.
As a matter of starting to learn the game, play it at the newest Version that is out.
All the 'required' dlc talk is just ... you need to have ~ 100 hours to even understand why people call them required (which they aren't)
The fact is that it's really hard to go back to play without them since they add quite a few quality of life features but beyond that everything is peachy.


Originally posted by shogunsmurf:
Ye vassal feeding isn't a requirement for WC huh people ? and you don't need art of war for it huh people ?

Nope, vassal feeding is in no way required to do a wc! (I did a otto wc in 1.19 and i can't even remember any vassal)
Last edited by equinox1911; Jun 27, 2017 @ 4:23am
Originally posted by equinox1911:
The fact is that it's really hard to go back to play without them since they add quite a few quality of life features but beyond that everything is peachy.

Nope, vassal feeding is in no way required to do a wc! (I did a otto wc in 1.19 and i can't even remember any vassal)

I played the mess of the game without DLC at first. Then I left it sitting in library for months untouched beofre my friend gifted me the suff needed to make this damn game enjoyable.

I do agree occupation transfer is a quality of life thing and not essential (although honesly it's so basic it should have been a free patch thing. Pushing vassal claims I understnad is DLC locked, but the transfer thing is kind of basic even if it isn't vital)

Originally posted by equinox1911:

Nope, vassal feeding is in no way required to do a wc! (I did a otto wc in 1.19 and i can't even remember any vassal)

Hey! You do know what you are talking about,
kaiyl_kariashi Jun 27, 2017 @ 7:01am 
you act like Art of war ADDED vassal feeding....we were vassal feeding for YEARS before Art of War came out (since day 1). (all AoW did was add mechanics to make it easier than it was).

You know, back when annexing vassals was completely free and what the heck is liberty desire?

back when you could blow a vassal up as much as you wanted with only the time it took to integrate it being the limiting factor (integration was about 3x what it takes now).


Hell when Art of War came out people were already questioning if vassal feeding was dead, because now they had to pay for it and pay attention to how big the vassals were getting.



----------------------------------------

RotW today is stronger than it has EVER been in the history of EU4. With no dlc.


Even native Americans can actually do something in the early game without CoP these days.


----------------------------------------

Republics were added to counter the MP problems or regencies in the base game.


RoM simply adds additional options for potentially avoiding them (but isn't garunteed even if you have the dlc). It mostly just lets you roll the dice a few more times. But you could still end up with a complete ♥♥♥♥ king, with a complete ♥♥♥♥ heir, with a complete ♥♥♥♥ consort, who dies a year into the 0 year old heirs rule (after tanking your prestige and legitmacy trying to abdicate/disinheirt your way to a god ruler). (which even happened during the paradox RoM MP when Starnan got a massive conga line of bad luck)

---------------------------------------

Not to mention that Common Sense because of manual development, actually makes the game play worse than it is without it, unless you yourself want to play Super Tall.

While they've toned it down a little from when it first came out by capping how much the ai is allowed to development provinces, it still functionally doubles the development of pretty much the whole world over the course of the game which in turn raises the prices and time required to core, and the rate at which you gain factors to reduce it may not keep up depending on how quickly you expand.
Last edited by kaiyl_kariashi; Jun 27, 2017 @ 7:42am
Well, we can agree on something. Vassal feeding is absoltuly not needed
♠.brT Jun 27, 2017 @ 9:24am 
Ye vassal feeding isn't a requirement for WC huh people ? and you don't need art of war for it huh people ? (to lazy to quote the idiot that needed reasons)

Not a single new player will go for a world conquest, hell 99% of veteran of EUIV don't go for world conquest, so yeah tell me again how a feature that is used for a very niche strategy is required to even play the game

Rights of men, same♥♥♥♥♥♥ without abdication (and common sense for devving) GL doing anything outside of Europe and keeping up with the average tech level.

People were able to play the game just fine without abidication, you seem to forget that abidication was added to the game, so players for years were able to play without having to use it, I myself almost never use the ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ feature.. so tell me again how this feature is actually required to play the game.

Also playing outside of Europe now is EASIER, because you don't need to go through the westernization process anymore which used to wreck your country for 30 ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ years, oh you have to deal with some tech penalty now? SO THE ♥♥♥♥ WHAT? everybody has to deal with the tech penalty, rights of man dlc was NERF to Western Europe, don't you see the amount of posts whining about how india is keeping up with western europe when it comes to tech?

You don't have it locked behind a DLC ? then I expect it to be playable, I don't mean able to load the country, but I mean do more than just sit there for a 100 years only to have Castile come around and steam roll you because you had +150% tech cost from institutions and endless 1/1/1 monarchs.

getgud and stop whining.

Hell one could even make a case that conquest of paradise is essiential and so is mandate of heaven for a country like Portugal (especially for a newer player), both these DLC's allow portugal to settle a lot quicker then without making them far more competative as a country.

Please MAKE THAT CASE Because i would love to know how conquest of Paradise is required, WHEN I DON'T EVEN HAVE IT, and have been playing this game just fine for over a thousand hours. I'd love to know how this ♥♥♥♥♥♥ piece of dlc that only thing it does is add features to native americans is required for the game to function.

And Portugal was already the easiest country for a colonization game, people were already able to pretty much take all of the new world with Portugal before (if you knew what you were doing) and even if you were a complete loser as Portugal you would still be able to at the very least get Brazil and the caribbeans for yourself before castile could catch up with you. So again how exactly is a new feature that was added after people already spent thousands of hours painting the map with Portugal, how exactly is this new feature required for Portugal to dominate the new world? it is not, it just makes it easier, not required.

In other words, without DLC's the only countries worth playing are European ones and even than you are limited in choice as some countries are very much harder without any DLC's than they would be with all.

In other words you don't know what your are talking about, you are just whining because "hey the dlcs make countries easier" BS, those same countries you complained about it were already easy to begin with, good job you are whining that some countries can be even easier, and apparently that is exactly what you want, an easier game, why don't you just play with the console command on and just anex all of europe if that's what you want...

At this point, DLC's are literally paying for easier diffuclty modes.

They are not difficulty modes, they add stuff that allows you to play differently, that's the entire point of those dlcs, for people who already spent a thousand plus hours to have still something else to do in the game, that's how this game is being kept alive with an active player base.
Last edited by ♠.brT; Jun 27, 2017 @ 9:31am
< >
Showing 16-30 of 31 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Jun 25, 2017 @ 1:00pm
Posts: 31