Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you avoid that you can get ruler to live up to 70, even got to 80 once.
These always RNG though.
Even if. It's because generals and kings have a check every month that gives them a certain chance of dying. If a character is a general and a king (or heir), they get two checks each month, which can pretty drastically increase their mortality. Or at least that's how I've heard it explained before.
Yes people did live to grow just as old as today in the middle ages however it was far from common and the average lifespan of 40-45 clearly shows that.
Your king dies at a relatively young age to depict just that.
Many children died in infancy due to malnutrition or disease, many youngsters died from accidents or disease and many grown ups died in their sleep due to a quarrel with their neighbour or disease.
Even kings weren't spared those trivialities as most of them (atleast during the first couple hundred years of this game) lived their life on the move rather than in a grand unheated and unhygienic castle.
A rather famous instance where I live was a king who got a splinter in his foot and noone could find it to get it out again. After a few days an infection had formed around the entry point but the king was a stubborn man and when the doctor said the foot had to come off he directed the doctor to the door with the words "I'd rather die a whole man than live as half a one".
A week later he died from gangrene...
Those are just stereotypes -_- It is true many people died as children, but I believe I read somewhere that those who lived to become older than 5 had a average life span of 65.
People didnt just go around slaughtering eachother with no punishment, and it wasn't quite as unsanitary as you might think,the idea of people walking around covered in ♥♥♥♥ or that they only bathed once a year is just pure BS. Sure it did happen that kings died from unfortionate causes. But alot of them lived for a really long time beacuse availability to the best healthcare hygiene and food available, and naming one example of a king dying from a splinter doesnt say much. There are people who die from less today. And there was people who were fine from splinters back then.
Sure hygiene was nothing compared to today, but people didnt walk around covered in poop and dirt, humans want to feel clean.
People tend to forget that just because they didn't have electricity 800 years ago doesn't mean everyone was mentally retarded. It doesn't take a state of the art modern medical lab to figure out that being filthy all the time is bad for your health.
https://eu4.paradoxwikis.com/Ruler#Chance_of_death_and_life_expectancy
As you can see here, ruler death is checked daily, events that kills rulers do not count.
Stability hits should not happen if your ruler wasn't leading an army.
As with normal life expectancy, the older your ruler, the longer he will live, to an extent.
King as general
King as general as leading an actual battle
That's all separate 3 death counter
Is this a version thing? Pretty sure stability hit happens no matter what the ruler's doing when he dies.
So eventually, your king gets syphilis and croaks.
Found the CKII player.