Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
its just not smart
Excuse me, it might sound noobish, but how?
Truce break and ruin stability and create massive AE :p
Lol that wasn't what I meant. Ottoman under selim didn't have to sign treaty of sevres 300 years earlier back then
In EU4 you would have had to drop off an army first, siege the entire city of London and only then you could even fight those ships.
I thought you were supposed to survive and keep the empire stable for next hundreds of years after doing it just like in history, as refered on my original post
i never said when you could do this
just that you could
But the fleet will blockade the straits/belts during every winter in EU4 and the straits dont freeze over, even after the coldest winter event pops :/
But all the provinces would cost much more than 100% war score
It would still be hard to defeat the Mamluks several times in just 3 years though. Wars take time.
Then after that you'd have to deal with overextension penalties...
or just use a older version that has exploits and do it super fast
i think you missed the point of this post badly. why not using console commands while you are at it?
that was yet to happen in eu4 timeline tho