Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yes you will lose the non-tribal reforms, however you keep the points, which means you can enact all tiers of tribal reforms instantly.
In my opinion it isn't bad for RP, because honestly, if I'm playing as the great Mongolian Empire, I want to be a nomad horde and raze everything I come in contact with back to a nice and flat plain I can graze my horses on. But I guess we all have different tastes in RP.
You can also form Great Yuan and remain a monarchy, plus get some really juicy national ideas.
Mhh I have a case with the Mayan, when once I reformed, my government was copied by the one I border (and allow me to reform my religion) and I also earned its equivalent of points (number of reforms). However reforms were chosen randomly. It forces me to spend 30 corruption because reforms used where totally inapropriate. I'm afraid it will be the same here.
From a RP perspective it's not being a horde with mongolian empire. It's being a horde, then switching (reforming) to a monarchy, and then going back to a horde.