About "good" performance. Are you all retarded?

[SpinGee]

Do you relize that its empty desert? Of course its very vell "optimized".
Comparing this to arkham knight where you have extremly complex sceneries in whom you move or fly in very fast speed...
Just use your brains sometimes...

[WhiteSosa]

R E T A R D ALERT R E T A R D ALERT! Its more than just a "empty desert" The desert in mad max is very detailed.

[Captain Deadpool]

Originalmente postado por generalkyle:

R E T A R D ALERT R E T A R D ALERT! Its more than just a "empty desert" The desert in mad max is very detailed.

I think you are the retarded one. The texture qualitiy is not that high compared to other AAA-title.
SpinGee's suggestion might be right.

[Marcel_SVK]

Mad Max looks very good w

Originalmente postado por SpinGee:

Do you relize that its empty desert? Of course its very vell "optimized".
Comparing this to arkham knight where you have extremly complex sceneries in whom you move or fly in very fast speed...
Just use your brains sometimes...

Mad Max looks very good. It is one of the best looking and best optimized games

[Adrinon]

OP is right

[BlueStinger]

Originalmente postado por Adrinon:

OP is right

No he's a ♥♥♥♥. And so are you for agreeing with him seeing as you've played the game for 15 hrs. 'Empty Desert'? lol

[Gloomseeker]

It doesn't change the fact that the game runs fairly well (if not exceedingly well) whereas the last Batman game had to be pulled from the store because the PC port was just awful.

It's sad that we've come to praise a game for running smoothly on machines that can put to shame any console available today but considering the number of bad ports and terribly optimized games we've had on the PC it would be hard to deny that Mad Max runs well.

[MancSoulja]

Originalmente postado por Mr.Shattered:

Originalmente postado por generalkyle:

R E T A R D ALERT R E T A R D ALERT! Its more than just a "empty desert" The desert in mad max is very detailed.

I think you are the retarded one. The texture qualitiy is not that high compared to other AAA-title.
SpinGee's suggestion might be right.

Neither of you clearly know how a game engines works, or what leads to achieving good optimization, the amount of objects or texture quality has absolutely nothing to do with it.

You could remove all the textures from Batman AK and just leave the pollys, & performance would still be bad, Optimization is achieved by using optimized lower level code, not by increasing or decreasing object density or texture resolution... lol

[Generalbullet]

What the f*ck does texture quality have to do with optimization? Edit What he said ^

[SpinGee]

Originalmente postado por MancSoulja:

Originalmente postado por Mr.Shattered:

I think you are the retarded one. The texture qualitiy is not that high compared to other AAA-title.
SpinGee's suggestion might be right.

Neither of you clearly know how a game engines works, or what leads to achieving good optimization, the amount of objects or texture quality has absolutely nothing to do with it.

You could remove all the textures from Batman AK and just leave the pollys, & performance would still be bad, Optimization is achieved by using optimized lower level code, not by increasing or decreasing object density or texture resolution... lol

Amount of objects definitely has something to do with performance

[Andrius227]

This game is indeed very well optimised and it is also very detailed.

Other games like batman doesn't fully use the available hardware thats why they run poorly. I can't think of any other game out of my 500games library that can use the full power of my sli setup. Most games don't support sli or use like 50% of the gpu's and give framerates anyway... But Mad Max uses up to 99% of both of my gtx980's and runs at mostly solid 144fps (with drops to ~120fps, never lower).

[SpinGee]

Originalmente postado por Andrius227:

This game is indeed very well optimised and it is also very detailed.

Other games like batman doesn't fully use the available hardware thats why they run poorly. I can't think of any other game out of my 500games library that can use the full power of my sli setup. Most games don't support sli or use like 50% of the gpu's and give :poop: framerates anyway... But Mad Max uses up to 99% of both of my gtx980's and runs at mostly solid 144fps (with drops to ~120fps, never lower).

This perfect example of complete lack of technical knowledge
I would never buy a sli, sli should act as one gpu from game/developer point of view, "support for sli" by game and by graphics drivers is just ridicolous. You are wasted your money.
And i will reapeat myself: mad max runs good becouse there is nothing to draw except empty desert and one mini camp per scene

[Andrius227]

Originalmente postado por SpinGee:

Originalmente postado por Andrius227:

This game is indeed very well optimised and it is also very detailed.

Other games like batman doesn't fully use the available hardware thats why they run poorly. I can't think of any other game out of my 500games library that can use the full power of my sli setup. Most games don't support sli or use like 50% of the gpu's and give framerates anyway... But Mad Max uses up to 99% of both of my gtx980's and runs at mostly solid 144fps (with drops to ~120fps, never lower).

This perfect example of complete lack of technical knowledge
I would never buy a sli, sli should act as one gpu from game/developer point of view, "support for sli" by game and by graphics drivers is just ridicolous. You are wasted your money.
And i will reapeat myself: mad max runs good becouse there is nothing to draw except empty desert and one mini camp per scene

Nope, Sli and multi core cpu's are advanced technologies and needs to be specifically supported by game developers.

Also the game is not empty, the draw distance is extremely long. There are many structures, objects and particle effects everywhere. Even the sand dunes are very detailed.

I mean, this game looks almost like real life (everything except ppl), which i cannot say about any other game.

[Evir]

Optimization exists beyond this, between visual fx, etc. Theres alot more to do with various other loads on the GPU then just Drawing textures and rendering a few objects. To meet todays standards then these objects need glare, all sorts of post processing including usually post processing AA types.

Many Many games have done all of the above poorly and run like poop poorly, whether a game runs well or not because of how much it has to draw isn't like taking off your pants and comparing sizes down there. Its common knowledge Batman was terribly optimized, it was. There was ZERO excuse for it, it wasn't about just drawing of objects.

Batman arkham legend on the coveted bat mobile scene's where tons of the city was being drawn, if you actually pulled over and looked around, the Textures were extremely low res, and the buildings were VERY low poly. Nothing you'd notice driving a bat mobile around tho right?

But the game still ran like crap so. Proofs in the pudding.


I don't own mad max but to hear people are getting good performance is a great change.

Because PC hardware for most part should beable to run this fidelity of content (excuse spelling very late and very tired) Without having game crippling issues with actually decently powerful rigs.


Bottom line PC performance should be comparible to console performance imo, 1:1, more power more fidelity

Originalmente postado por Andrius227:

Originalmente postado por SpinGee:

This perfect example of complete lack of technical knowledge
I would never buy a sli, sli should act as one gpu from game/developer point of view, "support for sli" by game and by graphics drivers is just ridicolous. You are wasted your money.
And i will reapeat myself: mad max runs good becouse there is nothing to draw except empty desert and one mini camp per scene

Nope, Sli and multi core cpu's are advanced technologies and needs to be specifically supported by game developers.

Also the game is not empty, the draw distance is extremely long. There are many structures, objects and particle effects everywhere. Even the sand dunes are very detailed.

Can hope moving forward in next 5 years with DX12 enabling multi-gpu processing support in a seamless manner all this fluff about poor SLI support/opimization will blow over.

[OnSync]

Originalmente postado por SpinGee:

Amount of objects definitely has something to do with performance

For GPU performance, not the code itself. As MancSoulja said, you can have everything removed but without proper code compression/optimazation it wont work well.
A good examples are Rage & Spec Ops The Line, both of them are mostly just desert and it works perfectly especially on newer GPU's but not in the aged ones. So if you see my point that performance and amount of objects has nothing to do with the code itself.

[Morrowind's Most Dangerous N'wah]

Originalmente postado por SpinGee:

Do you relize that its empty desert? Of course its very vell "optimized".
Comparing this to arkham knight where you have extremly complex sceneries in whom you move or fly in very fast speed...
Just use your brains sometimes...

What is your point exactly? There's more to the game being "well optimized" than having relatively sparse enviorments (compared to Arkham Knight anyways). This game may not have the fanciest graphics around but it works near perfectly for probably 90% of people which is much more than you can say for most AAA releases these days, and at the end of the day I'd rather have my game actually work well than have super detailed enviorments.