I am glad they changed the girl warrior and acrobat

[Big Money! Deluxe]

while it is not much the attempt at fixing a mistake is appreciated, oversexualization of female characters compared to the male counterpart is bad

[Ignosius]

So what you're saying is that they should have made the male characters more sexualized.

[Big Money! Deluxe]

Originally posted by Ignosius:

So what you're saying is that they should have made the male characters more sexualized.

I mean sure why not that would've been better than having exclusively female jobs like that

[Judge Cudge]

Female beauty is precious and spiritually nourishing.
Suffocating it is evil.

[Big Money! Deluxe]

Originally posted by Judge Cudge:

Female beauty is precious and spiritually nourishing.
Suffocating it is evil.

man just go watch porn

[Big Money! Deluxe]

Originally posted by Vivian, Mana & Kendall:

Originally posted by Amplify:

And here we see a clown outside of its natural habitat of a private discord server.

*edit*
Sure didn't know Warrior and Acrobat were exclusive to female characters! You missed your calling as a Twitter poster, OP. How in the name of any deity you like is a pixellated cartoon caricature of a woman wearing a role and gender appropriate stereotypical fantasy costume "bad" or a "mistake"? Explain it to me carefully.

You insult them, yet you're not smart enough to understand why literal bikinis on a warrior is just terrible and lazy character design. If you need someone to explain *that* to you carefully, then how in the hell did you ever manage to figure out how to drive on your own?

this dude edited his reply like 3 times to try to "own" me harder it was pretty funny to see in real time lol

[Judge Cudge]

Originally posted by Big Money! Deluxe:

Originally posted by Judge Cudge:

Female beauty is precious and spiritually nourishing.
Suffocating it is evil.

man just go watch porn

Porn is disgusting and psychologically harmful.

[Ignosius]

Originally posted by Vivian, Mana & Kendall:

You insult them, yet you're not smart enough to understand why literal bikinis on a warrior is just terrible and lazy character design. If you need someone to explain *that* to you carefully, then how in the hell did you ever manage to figure out how to drive on your own?

Counterpoint: It's hot.

[Vivian, Mana & Kendall]

Originally posted by Ignosius:

Originally posted by Vivian, Mana & Kendall:

You insult them, yet you're not smart enough to understand why literal bikinis on a warrior is just terrible and lazy character design. If you need someone to explain *that* to you carefully, then how in the hell did you ever manage to figure out how to drive on your own?

Counterpoint: It's hot.

If you feel the desire or need to get going with low poly, cartoony chibi models, then we're just going to step way from this topic because that is a whole other level of sad. To the point we're genuinely concerned we might say something to send you deeper into whatever hole you're currently in.

[Slugbait]

OH NO HOW DARE THEY GET ALL HOT N BOTHERED BY SOME PIXELS

[Judge Cudge]

Originally posted by Vivian, Mana & Kendall:

You insult them, yet you're not smart enough to understand why literal bikinis on a warrior is just terrible and lazy character design. If you need someone to explain *that* to you carefully, then how in the hell did you ever manage to figure out how to drive on your own?

It's not lazy character design, it's idealized character design. Where the armor does not suffocate the physical beauty of the wearer.

Much like "wasteful" and "impractical" armor with abs and pecs embroidered on it, or any of the shirtless barbarian warrior archtypes shown in media. These decisions are made on purpose to choose aesthetics and novelty over flatfooted practicality.

I have no interest in reading, watching, or playing in worlds in which all things are merely done according to the path of least resistance. Not even the real world is that mundane.

[GalYurr]

Western culture objectifies women so profoundly that women IN the west objectify themselves. Forget slut shaming, they practise modesty shaming, virtue shaming, dignity shaming. Because they think:

- "Who are you to think that every man in the public sphere isn't supposed to be able to see your body?"
- "What makes you so special?"
- "What makes you think you have the right to deny any mans eyes access to your body?"

They think that women's bodies are meant to be public decorations. They don't want dignified/virtuous/modest women in public. When a woman's body is covered they feel deprived because she is defying their entitlement.

When a man is fully covered up in public people will still acknowledge his existence because men's role in the west is not decorative; women's is. And that passes in the west for female empowerment.

[Insomniac]

Ignore the Jester farmers guys.

[Ignosius]

Originally posted by Vivian, Mana & Kendall:

Originally posted by Ignosius:

Counterpoint: It's hot.

If you feel the desire or need to get going with low poly, cartoony chibi models, then we're just going to step way from this topic because that is a whole other level of sad. To the point we're genuinely concerned we might say something to send you deeper into whatever hole you're currently in.

Okay. I'll just continue having fun and enjoying life.

You do you, I guess.

[Amplify]

Originally posted by Vivian, Mana & Kendall:

Originally posted by Amplify:

And here we see a clown outside of its natural habitat of a private discord server.

*edit*
Sure didn't know Warrior and Acrobat were exclusive to female characters! You missed your calling as a Twitter poster, OP. How in the name of any deity you like is a pixellated cartoon caricature of a woman wearing a role and gender appropriate stereotypical fantasy costume "bad" or a "mistake"? Explain it to me carefully.

You insult them, yet you're not smart enough to understand why literal bikinis on a warrior is just terrible and lazy character design. If you need someone to explain *that* to you carefully, then how in the hell did you ever manage to figure out how to drive on your own?

You fail to explain how a gender appropriate cartoon fantasy costume in a cartoon fantasy game is a bad thing, the reason you don't is because you're unable, because there is no good reason. The irony of you complaining that I'm insulting them and then instantly trying to call me an idiot with your next breath is not lost to me.

For example here:

Originally posted by Vivian, Mana & Kendall:

Originally posted by Ignosius:

Counterpoint: It's hot.

If you feel the desire or need to get going with low poly, cartoony chibi models, then we're just going to step way from this topic because that is a whole other level of sad. To the point we're genuinely concerned we might say something to send you deeper into whatever hole you're currently in.

you yourself admit they're low poly cartoony chibi models, so what exactly is your problem that you have that's the issue exactly? What makes it "bad"? Get off the internet and frankly get over yourself.

Originally posted by Big Money! Deluxe:

Originally posted by Vivian, Mana & Kendall:

You insult them, yet you're not smart enough to understand why literal bikinis on a warrior is just terrible and lazy character design. If you need someone to explain *that* to you carefully, then how in the hell did you ever manage to figure out how to drive on your own?

this dude edited his reply like 3 times to try to "own" me harder it was pretty funny to see in real time lol

Once, which you haven't and still have not replied to, because again there is no good reason for it and you're either a troll or an idiot, there is literally no middle ground here. If you claimed you hadn't seen the edit that would have given you an out, but you can't claim now you didn't see the question.

[Vivian, Mana & Kendall]

Originally posted by Judge Cudge:

Originally posted by Vivian, Mana & Kendall:

You insult them, yet you're not smart enough to understand why literal bikinis on a warrior is just terrible and lazy character design. If you need someone to explain *that* to you carefully, then how in the hell did you ever manage to figure out how to drive on your own?

It's not lazy character design, it's idealized character design. Where the armor does not suffocate the physical beauty of the wearer.

Much like "wasteful" and "impractical" armor with abs and pecs embroidered on it, or any of the shirtless barbarian warrior archtypes shown in media. These decisions are made on purpose to choose aesthetics and novelty over flatfooted practicality.

I have no interest in reading, watching, or playing in worlds in which all things are merely done according to the path of least resistance. Not even the real world is that mundane.

You ♥♥♥♥♥ like a child about not wanting to to intake media that goes the path of least resistance, yet you defend the most overused and ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ laughably bad design of bikini armor. You're not even capable of keeping what you want in line.

Originally posted by Slugbait:

OH NO HOW DARE THEY GET ALL HOT N BOTHERED BY SOME PIXELS

Good job at demonstrating your complete and utter inability to comprehend what you're reading.

Originally posted by GalYurr:

Western culture objectifies women so profoundly that women IN the west objectify themselves. Forget slut shaming, they practise modesty shaming, virtue shaming, dignity shaming. Because they think:

- "Who are you to think that every man in the public sphere isn't supposed to be able to see your body?"
- "What makes you so special?"
- "What makes you think you have the right to deny any mans eyes access to your body?"

They think that women's bodies are meant to be public decorations. They don't want dignified/virtuous/modest women in public. When a woman's body is covered they feel deprived because she is defying their entitlement.

When a man is fully covered up in public people will still acknowledge his existence because men's role in the west is not decorative; women's is. And that passes in the west for female empowerment.

No, it doesn't. How someone gets this delusional is amazing to us.