Lol @ the base price being $10

[Evilnapkin]

This is barely higher quality than Flash games I used to get for free.

[DJB]

引用自 Big Boom Boom：

It may actually be, something they made while getting bored of fixing the mess called SOTS II.

Yes, it is side-project, but plays like a "main" game.

[TheLastLine]

the main difference is that this is actually published by Paradox, which is a major PC Publisher, the other games you mentioned are all indie devs. I guess they feel the game is worth $10. If you feel it is not, then dont buy it at that price, wait for a price you would be willing to pay.

[Kabump]

Opinons. We all have them. So this game isn't worth 10 bucks to you, glad you didn't pay full price, then. I have Issac, Dreadmore, and this; I like all of them.

[ddub]

引用自 downphoenix：

the main difference is that this is actually published by Paradox, which is a major PC Publisher, the other games you mentioned are all indie devs. I guess they feel the game is worth $10. If you feel it is not, then dont buy it at that price, wait for a price you would be willing to pay.

No Paradox, this is an indie title.

[Iron Ghost]

Look at all these people getting trolled...good job Evilnapkin.

[Fenus aka [DF]EHOT]

This game worth twice the each penny I paid for it. Really.

Compare it to the "free" flash games? LOL and good luck, kiddo.

[Red Eagle LXIX]

In my opinion (we all know about those), judging a game based on cost alone is wrong.

One should judge a game based on how much entertainment one has garnered from the product as related to cost.

I paid $2.49 + $4.99 for this game and the DLC.
I've already enjoyed the game for 15+ hours.

If I never play the game again that would mean I spent less than $0.50 per hour to be entertained. That is a heck of a bargain and well worth my investment.

Yes, I will be playing this game more, so the value to cost ratio will continue to increase.

[Nu-Pham]

Yeah, this game is surprising deep for how accessible it is. $10 is a really good price. Now they just need to get it over to the vita

[Conscript]

Hope you don't ever try Faster Than Light.

These games are easily worth every penny spent on them.

Anyone who has been playing games pre-2000's knows that graphics don't make the game at all.

[Evilnapkin]

引用自 Conscript：

Anyone who has been playing games pre-2000's knows that graphics don't make the game at all.

I was into Zelda before it was acceptable to be into Zelda.

Next.

[Red Eagle LXIX]

Graphics, who needs graphics. I remember getting eaten by a Grue long ago.

[Rognar]

REPLYING TO OBVIOUS BAIT

[zerocool]

This game is a lot more than its visuals . give it a go

[Thanks4thegear]

引用自 Evilnapkin：

I don't buy most AAA games at full price because of the reasons you stated.

You really jumped to a lot of conclusions, but with the exposure Steam has and how much they'd make off the game being $5 anyway, for what it is they'd still be making a mint off of it. Though this game is fun, it plays like a side-project indie game, not one of the full-fledged titles that I think justify a $10 - $20 price tag.

Got it for $2.50 because I've had my eye on it for a while, and keep in mind, entitlement works both ways. Maybe I'm entitled for thinking $10 base is "too high", but perhaps the devs are overvaluing their property, and feeling entitled to more than they deserve.

Don't listen to this street ape named Evilnapkin, this game is awesome. Visuals and animations are good for a roguelike, and there are tons of hours of gameplay. I bought it at full price and never once thought again about the decision, completely worth the money.

[lPaladinl]

I have zero complaints with this game. The graphics are charming enough. Sure there's better 2D graphics out there but there's also far worse. The gameplay and content alone is great for what it is, and i'm still waiting on getting myself the DLC sometime, which I see promises a lot of new goodies to an already fun game.

This certainly isn't "just some flash game".