Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Maybe that flashback would work in the cutscene after the final boss, but putting it in the first sacred lands scene would be terrible, it would completely give the twist away immediately. Honestly though, this doesn't really seem necessarry.
Who says that they did discover it?
The tracker doesn't have that big a level of precision. The map's all wavy. Even if it could show Rush's position, it wouldn't mean anything because he has a Talisman, which is a sleeping Remnant. Marina claims that the Conqueror shows up on the map because of the talismans he carries.
I think that all the Conqueror's overt hinting, combined with the first Sacred Lands cutscene, combined with Rush's reaction when Irina jokes that a Remnant could even look like a mitra is enough.
Wait, what "dark" Sacred Lands? I must have forgotten that part. It has been a while.
If they flesh anything out, it should be what a remnant really is. Is it actually the remnant of something else? Leftovers from some great battle? We really aren't given much at all.