Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I doubt that this table would have taken in a lot of quarters back in the day.. for sure. Very odd and frustrating, in my opinion, especially the upper playfield.
I cannot imagine the ball acting like that in real life, is there some sort of gravity modifier? How is it accomplished, if it is like this in real life?
So yeah… it seems realistically modeled. Only now you can play all you want for a fixed cost.
As far as the main playfield, if it's easier or harder in realistic depends on how the real table is set up (mainly how tight the tilt is). With a loose tilt, you can do a lot of slaps and moves (some for no warning, some for a warning like outlane shimmies) that simply aren't possible on FX. Also in real life, the ball is more responsive to a big move with the ball in open table than it is in FX. For a tight tilt, FX is easier, and bang backs are easier on FX. And normal on FX is almost always much easier than the real thing.