Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
if the game is really bad as you said. how are you gonna explain this information?
I enjoy Ragnarök much more than the first game, especially the combat.
Having to play Atreus is not really an improvement IMO, and the story and all the cheesy emotional stuff is boring af tbh.
And ffs that Ironwood mission with Angosomething (don't remember her name), how boring that also was...
I am not sure how you or other guys saying that I said the game is bad. I have literally said that this has a nice story but not something I wanted. I wanted more action.
Like there are genre in movies, I don't like romantic movies, I like action adventure movies.
Also, a simple + and - don't represent the whole picture and going by that logic do you agree that GoW as a series is inferior to say Elden ring.
Those are different games and have different audience so please don't throw around these numbers and read what I said.
Hello,
Personally, I don't agree. I always hate the very idea that more options make things better and my go to example is Sekiro.
Another example will be the statement from various God of war players that goes like "GoWR valhalla made me experience various combat mechanics that I didn't got to experiment with in base game". If this argument is true which I certainly think is then there are various red flags about the combat design of the base game.
I won't talk about 10/10 or what not but combat for sure is the weak point of the game.
I mean let's be real, the game is about 25 hours with majority portion being cutscenes, talking, riding, walking, running, solving puzzles etc. There is very little combat.
Also, for the most part its similar to god of war 2018.
Now for playing as Loki, let's be real never even once did I got badass feeling while playing as Loki. Yeah, you might have gotten it but neither me nor my friend had such feeling.
I won't say that its bad but for certain it isn't badass.
I hadn't played the original 3 games and kept hearing how badass it was. How you kill the GODS.
Fast-track to God of war 2018 releasing on PC. I got to play it last year on my pc and well it was ok at best in terms of being so heavy on combat. If you say it had combat as primary focus then please don't lie to yourself, the primary focus is story and I don't even hate that part, I hate the part where people say the primary focus is combat.
Now, couple more year and GoWR comes to PC and again I hear they improved the combat and now there are more enemies which after playing I can agree but only to some extent. You see the game is STILL the story based game primarily, hell they went even heavy on the story.
The new enemies are mostly meh, there are more options to combat but combat itself it not improved. It the same and don't even talk about the camera while combat.