the amount of positive reviews with 2-4h is astonishing...

[Wilhelm]

guys. i know it is a DRG game and we all love to rock and stone.
but it is a bad uninspired auto-battler where your build never feels OP and all classes are just one upgrade away from each other.

why the positive review bombing?

[InterWill]

Maybe other people don't think it's bad?

I've done some epic builds doing 30k damage crits that deletes the entire screen (on hazard 4). And to me, the difference between the classes feels quite pronounced as evident by the amount of players who say they prefer one class over another.

[Bobby Dy Watson]

If your build never feel OP I think the problem is you, not the game

[TwoToneWilly]

Originally posted by Wüstenfuchs:

guys. i know it is a DRG game and we all love to rock and stone.
but it is a bad uninspired auto-battler where your build never feels OP and all classes are just one upgrade away from each other.

why the positive review bombing?

This argument in gaming has been had ad nauseam. You don't need to play a game front to back, 1000 hours, and multiple playthroughs to know if you like it or not. It's just not that deep, man. It's a roguelike, bullet hell and I think they did a pretty good job. I've seen much, much worse titles in this genre get praise that I thought were fairly bare bones and underdeveloped. I don't think DRG Survivors is one of those games.

[HAZARD-bot]

Probably also getting reviews by people who played the demo from a few months back already

[Tyyne]

So you're the one who decides what is good and what is bad? Not gonna work that way, kid.

[Dank Vader]

Originally posted by Wüstenfuchs:

guys. i know it is a DRG game and we all love to rock and stone.
but it is a bad uninspired auto-battler where your build never feels OP and all classes are just one upgrade away from each other.

why the positive review bombing?

A good lesson in life is:
If you look to your left and see an ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥, then you look to your right and see an ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. Maybe it isnt them...

[Drenus]

At least purchase the game, before trying to troll

The game has a good base, and its early acces for a reason

[Poots]

"you aren't allowed to have fun!" calm down, people like what they like. Just because its not your type of game doesn't make it bad.

[Supa]

well right now it has like 82% which is low for early access game so it's still low

[Supa]

Originally posted by Poots:

"you aren't allowed to have fun!" calm down, people like what they like. Just because its not your type of game doesn't make it bad.

but it quite literally does make it bad for them

[Neidrocas]

Originally posted by Wüstenfuchs:

guys. i know it is a DRG game and we all love to rock and stone.
but it is a bad uninspired auto-battler where your build never feels OP and all classes are just one upgrade away from each other.

why the positive review bombing?

In the beginning I thought that too "build never feels OP", now mostly of runs I just don't use suply pod to kill bosses because I want farm more in the floor.

When I start reading the elemental effects and doing some combos, it became easier to create OP builds

[***]

you're right, if it wasn't branded deep rock galactic it would sit at 60% positive, it's one of the weakest game in this genre

[Lieutenant Dan]

And the amount of negative 2 hour reviews is negative bombing then right? because there could be no possible reason to leave a review after playing a game for 2 hours, other than some kind of score manipulation.

OR

it's very positive because people are enjoying it?

[Falli]

I played almost 6h and I really like it, because it is fun to play. I don't compare games with each other.

[[LoFR]Kaizoku]

Stop replying to the obvious trolls and bots trying to farm clown awards. Ignore/report and move on. They're a cancer putting the final nails in the coffin on steam forums.