is DLSS 4 not available yet?

[Bob]

nvidia app doesnt support warframe so i cant manually select it

[󠀡󠀡]

No idea why they're sticking with DLSS 2. You can see it in the DLSS Swapper app. It looks horrible, although I don't think a 4090 needs DLSS.

[Verios44]

I run just fine without dlss, or fsr. DE does not need to waste their time adding fake frame tools of any kind.

[Rekkin]

I'm pretty sure that if you have a card that supports DLSS, you have a card that can run Warframe with no issues. It's not a very demanding game.

[Protocol7]

Yeah I can run the game at 2K 144fps most of the time no problem, only struggles in like, Hollvania and one or two other tilesets (and to be clear, "struggles" is still completely playable, usually above 60fps)

[pirate135246]

smaa is better than dlss, and you dont need dlss to run this game. if on hdr no aa is still better than dlaa since its blurry even on gen 4

[BingusDingus]

Originally posted by pirate135246:

smaa is better than dlss, and you dont need dlss to run this game. if on hdr no aa is still better than dlaa since its blurry even on gen 4

SMAA is Anti-aliasing, DLSS is the highest quality upscaler. Many people play on 144fps+ displays, having DLSS allows people to achieve such frame rates at 1440p and beyond.

DLSS 4 does not look blurry at all, the only people bashing DLSS these days are those who're stuck in the past and know nothing of the present, the technology has come a long ways.

[Verios44]

Originally posted by BingusDingus:

Originally posted by pirate135246:

smaa is better than dlss, and you dont need dlss to run this game. if on hdr no aa is still better than dlaa since its blurry even on gen 4

SMAA is Anti-aliasing, DLSS is the highest quality upscaler. Many people play on 144fps+ displays, having DLSS allows people to achieve such frame rates at 1440p and beyond.

DLSS 4 does not look blurry at all, the only people bashing DLSS these days are those who're stuck in the past and know nothing of the present, the technology has come a long ways.

I do agree that dlss4 resolves alot of blurry texture issues from past versions.

I still believe that in the big picture, it is very unfortunate that many games are developed to rely on upscalers to resolve optimization issues.

[pirate135246]

Originally posted by BingusDingus:

Originally posted by pirate135246:

smaa is better than dlss, and you dont need dlss to run this game. if on hdr no aa is still better than dlaa since its blurry even on gen 4

SMAA is Anti-aliasing, DLSS is the highest quality upscaler. Many people play on 144fps+ displays, having DLSS allows people to achieve such frame rates at 1440p and beyond.

DLSS 4 does not look blurry at all, the only people bashing DLSS these days are those who're stuck in the past and know nothing of the present, the technology has come a long ways.

im on 1440p and don't need dlss to hit 144fps. its all about knowing that certain settings tank the framerate in half like volumetrics. Also if you don't notice that dlss is blurry compared to smaa you need to schedule an appointment to get your eyes checked

[Niczu]

Originally posted by Verios44:

I run just fine without dlss, or fsr. DE does not need to waste their time adding fake frame tools of any kind.

You realize that DLSS isn't just framegen, right? I do not like framegen but upscaling is pretty nice imo. And since we already have DLSS on the game it would make sense to get an updated version of it. Given how players can manually swap DLSS to other games (wont work with WF due to online nature) it would probably be pretty minor thing to do.

And nobody would force you to use it, so you'll lose nothing if it were to be implemented.

[SilentMashiko]

heard u can bruteforce it but on ur own risk

[Zenith]

Warframe is maintained by a developer team that actually cares about performance. You don't need DLSS for a good framerate.