Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
They came around twice. The first time was a promotional stunt for the EGS version, to encourage players to give that version a try.
The second time was just before Epic decided to butcher their own legacy and delete all the Unreal games from all storefronts. Epic was deciding to burn house and DE managed to get permission to just sell the skins for platinum one last time before Epic erased Unreal from the modern landscape. Now, Epic will not allow DE to renew that license to sell the Unreal skins.
That's where we sit. DE needs Epic's permission, and Epic insists there was never Unreal, only Fortnite.
It does seem odd to say the least. I would think Epic would want to embrace their past but perhaps there is some overriding factor? It comes across as self destructive to me.
It would seem to suggest that Tim Sweeny at least makes business decisions based on ego or snap judgement and whim if that is the case. Oh well, another day in video games right?