Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
That chart's ONE part of the equation. You'd like to think that tells the whole picture, but it only shows how short sighted a vast majority of people are. How many of those are aborts? How many are failures? How many people were actually active in a game? How many actually made REAL use of the clone? That stat doesn't show any of that. It's one metric and it's the same way DE's always handled it. It's why they're looking at that metric now and thinking they've hit upon the golden unicorn bullet while many PRIMES are still nearly completely unused for anything other than fodder. It's smoke and mirrors and driving up the hate boners many users have when they feel they could shine just a little more if that DAMNED FRAME WASN'T IN MY WAY!
Truth be told, those guns feel bad cause well... Maybe YOU didn't aim. When I wanna use single target guns... I use'em. When I wanna pull out old frost... I do. Nothing's stopping that. No amount of wukongs have stopped me from contributing and you're certainly not losing anything from them being present unless you just actually hate playing with people and don't yet know why. Only thing I can think of.
Ivara and her bow would like a word with you. Good at just about any content you want. invisible whenever. Bow does insane damage. Good at spies, defenses, eliminations (though AOE ability frames tend to do faster clears), interceptions, assassinations, and well, kinda a jack of all trades. All you gotta do is level you crosshair in the general direction and hold the trigger for a moment before releasing. The multishot takes care of the rest.
Mesa has a literal god tier aimbot that's way more accurate than Wukong's clone. You literally just spin your view. Do I need to mention what scenarios that could be good at?
Limbo has a dome that currently is king at defense and is invincible whenever he wants to be everywhere else.
Inaros is basically a "don't die" frame. Bring what you want to the party in that case.
Any frame can be made to work pretty well at nearly anything barring a few sad cases where the frame is just a literal worse variant of another. Should EVERYTHING get a nerf then?
And many, many other people didn't find that fun. Should they be ignored?
I need the TL;DR for this because you typed a lot of nothing worth reading.
papery and only good for the 3
Hmm makes sense.
I feel like a lot of people agree with you because of these comparisons, but it doesn't add up. We aren't strictly talking about aimbot, power, invisibility or even how good a warframe is across all modes, we are talking about autonomous domination & profitability in conjunction with versatility. Something that was particularly relevant to Wukong.
If a warframe allows players to stand there and do virtually nothing, then the skill roof goes way down, and the incentive for players to buy things goes down with it. (Why buy anything else when Wukong runs it on autopilot?)
If a warframe is decent at every mode, that doesn't necessarily warrant a nerf, but Wukong was certainly a special case to behold.
You're absolutely right that they shouldn't nerf something just because it is powerful, but we have to look at these nerfs & changes in full context.
Even with the examples you gave with Mesa, Limbo, Ivara, and even Inaros, all of those warframes are not run on autopilot like Wukong was.
You still have to aim, you still have to move depending on the mode, and you certainly have to manage ammo & energy. (That is even more true in light of the recent ammo changes)
Now, there are probably exceptions based on the node and kind of mission set you're running, but overall I think there are many players who agree that we are comparing apples to oranges. They might be fruit, but they are not the same.
Many warframes can be used in every single kind of mission, but the level of skill to use them, the inherent weaknesses, abilities, strengths, and acquisition of said warframes make comparing Wukong to anything else a highly subjective and complex topic. And again, on the topic of differences, none of them had a clone or the multifaceted invincibility like Wukong.
If 55 % uses Excalibur or any other frame then they will nerf that as well.
Players take the least path of resistance like go afk while casting banshee 4 - got nerfed
Trinity jumping explosive hell - nerfed
so on so forth for more than 7 years
Your feedback is welcome But never expect the most popular method to not get nerfed- you would be fool and always be a fool if you think that will change ever
This and they need to appease to their china communist masters at tencent.....
Let's be real that ivara comparison ain't it, she does not have the versatility.
Ofcourse a lot of people will be angry- cause 55% of you were maining him lmfaoooo
Too many people use him cause he was autopilot and powerful. So they'd afk with him, stuff like that. If you're playing normally a bot at half damage can still be powerful. Just spawn a specter if you're unhappy.
You also have to aim to kill anything with Wukong.. Or heaven forbid you hit a button... Like every other frame. Clone kills stuff but it's not much different than say hitting 4 and letting an AOE frame do it's thing. Little movement for energy and do it all over again. Cause remember, no movement means nothing happening except your clone taking a seat. You didn't solve the AFK problem you think there is with this nerf. Other frames can easily do it too as you'll soon see. This is nothing new.
All I'm equating with my other post is that those frames can easily be OP too with VERY little work. Dominating at what? Killing bots? Heaven forbid that's the case in a horde shooter (No matter how much DE wishes it wasn't that.). If you're not dominating them then that'sa you problem. Single shots or not, the weapons that do damage can easily keep the tides at bay. A few movement keys is just not that different to a little mouse wiggle that takes even less effort if you wanna go that route. I really don't move the mouse much to aim, it's not a grand sweeping flourishing action that separates wheat from chaff as a lot of people think is happening. Even less so on controllers. There will come a time when the content runs dry and unless they do pull out something significant in the game.. It's gonna die off. It's not an infinite well of money and you can take steps as a company that will slow that down.
Just not much point to a larger number of weapons and frames, not because the AOE or abilities are there but because they're actually weak or just weaker varients of another frame. Nerf to the frame or guns didn't change that. They're still weak.
What I really don't get is the celebration of having less options in a game all about grinding till you're numb. This isn't a skill game. If you're thinking that then well... I got no words. Take off your mods and tell me where the skill is there cause all it'd be then is an exorcise in cutting off your face to spite your nose cause it seems to me all the "hahah no skill" folks are literally just preaching what that inevitably is. If you want difficulty for difficulty's sake, do it. Nothing's stopping you.