Should active Companions/pets show in our player profile view?

[Fourth2Infinity]

Its not really a question for me. THEY SHOULD. but im woundering how many people agree.

[zvampen]

no

[Vulbjorn]

Maybe, leaning towards yes. If they're placed somewhere to the side, to avoid cluttering the pedestal.

[FieserMoep]

Just show those Kavats in their natrual habitat:
Bleeding out somewhere in the air.

[Jagdpanzer IV/70 Sd.Kfz 162/1]

Well Helios is there... sort of... I mean the floaty glowing ball of light is there...

[Smokey]

Originally posted by Vulbjorn, the walrus rider.:

Maybe, leaning towards yes. If they're placed somewhere to the side, to avoid cluttering the pedestal.

Would like if they did that :)

[Fishyflakes]

If you have Baro Sikharas, they do appear :C

[thekapn655321]

While sentinels have been around for a while, they played less of a role than companions as a whole do today.

Of course it's not entirely necessary, but I suspect they will implement this in the not-too-distant future as a result of Kavat party buffs and the like becoming a factor as they have.

If you see more party based mechanics from non-kavat companions soon, then expect this change to follow.

As it is, whether you scan something or not, or can briefly cloak sometimes or not, has little to do with how the party will need to prepare itself. ...though, with Shield Charger and Kavats, we're a short distance from this having a functional reason to list companions in party equipment.

[Fourth2Infinity]

this was posted before we were ristricted to a tiny pedisatal. as long as we have it like that i dont see companions even fitting anymore. homestly the end game is makeing an awsome looking setup. and alot of people dress and color companions etc to match. i feel if companions where shown people would be more inclined to customize them. as ive been seeing with the operator now that they show.