Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Este tema ha sido cerrado 
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
ask any person whats moral and you'll get an array of different answers.
however, whats important is that the majority cannot and would not justify auto banning people for a week over gay
in that sense, it's possibly moral for the person in power, but the "societal" moral would disagree.
and i think its fair to count that as the "moral"; in the same way that stoning people isnt moral.
dico; sed non dicebam esse callidum virum
look, i'm debating a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ chat ban on christmas with people who have no power to do anything about it. i literally said in my last reply that i'm a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ idiot. do i look like someone trying to play the intelectual card?
i mean, i like conversations with depth. my idea of fun is debating ♥♥♥♥.
i have an active account that i've spent thousands of hours on debating subjects and roman history. debating is my idea of fun.
i like philosophy; i've read plato, descarte, kant, tao te ching, yadda yadda.
if i didnt find philosophy interesting, or atleast debate, why the hell would i be here right now?
what kind of person cares so much about a field/study and then does none of the studying?
like you think someone who cares this much about morals over a video game ban over "gay" would NOT have any interest in philosophy or reading it? if i get this involved in a debate over this ♥♥♥♥, what else do you think i do in my free time?
because lets set the record straight here: i have no illusions that i get anything out of this besides debate. no mod is going to come in here and go: "♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ get this to de right now we have a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ intelectual badass here"
mmkay?
so now my question: why would someone like me who is so obviously interested in the subject matter not spend more time doing it? im curious about this.
people who think a person cannot have in depth conversations without trying to appear smart are the biggest jack ass in existence. do i have to prostrate myself infront of you and proclaim you the wisest man on earth so that i can talk about morals over a "gay" video game chat ban?
Imagine being an angry white kid who has to call every other group of people names online just because he's terrified of girls and black men. Now that's a pathetic existence!
quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur
Yes, your earlier posts clearly are someone trying (key word being "trying") to be an intellectual, and when it backfired you tried playing dumb.
you should learn how to debate then.
I'm going to assume you mean debating the impacts of events in roman history since history by itself doesn't have much to debate (it's pretty immutable that Agustus came before Nero). You should work on eliminating ambiguity from your statements as well as learning how to debate.
and I read Sun Tzu. that doesn't make me a general.
Because you can't ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ in region chat so you're ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ here.
you assume there aren't other people who have tried to appear smarter than they are.
You ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥, like you are now.
Glad to see that you are aware and honest about your ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. most deny it 'til the end.
why would someone who enjoys ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ continue to ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥? same reason couples who enjoy sex ♥♥♥♥ like rabbits. opportunity and desire.
nah. you have a clear inferiority issue you need to sort out with yourself.
i know a guy like you, last conversation he tried to convince me that reading philosophy is pretentious.
its just projection; everyone who puts in effort is an idiot projecting his inferiority; yet somehow you are a genius.
which one of us called ourselves an idiot, and which one seems bitter and unable to do so? i dont want to go too hard, but i spoke latin because your name is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ pretentious latin, your phrase applies more to yourself than me, my friend.
some mistake my willingness to acknowlege my own stupidity as stupidity, but its rather the opposite. wisest man is he who knows he is not wise and all that. i invite you to drop your complex and join me in the mud to excel.
It's just projection. Contracted it is is it's. Don't pick up the chair by its legs--its is possessions. Why should anyone trust your take on all your tomes when you don't know basic English spelling? What were you doing with those books?
lol well said
Surely not you, don't worry, friend.
And you pulling out the random "lol white kid afraid of blacks and gurls" out of nowhere is unnecessary. As if this thread wasn't already enough of a ♥♥♥♥ pile. No one was talking about race.