Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You can build a Paris now if you desire but you'll be back grinding these Mk-1s very soon.
so there's no advantage to leveling a mk1 version vs. the non-mk1 version? I can still rank up the non-mk1 version right? Part of the reason I'm asking is because I've gotten blueprints for non-mk weapons, a couple of which I have the mats to craft, and I was wondering if I should buy the mk1 version first and rank that up before building and ranking up the non-mk1 version.
Sorry I'm still confused. Why does it matter whether I rank up the mk1 instead of ranking up the non-mk1 version?
MK-1 version of weapon is DIFFERENT than default version (just like Primed, Prisma etc variants are different as well). They both hold mastery in them, and since MK-1 are so easy to aquire, it's generally good idea to level all of them to maximum, for mastery fodder.
You need XP to level up.
Mk-1 is cheap.
Cheap means easy XP.
There?
I think from other comments the part I'm not clear on is just how many weapons, etc. need to be leveled to increase MR. Is it that ALL weapons I come across I need to hold onto and level? Is my thinking incorrect that if I have both a mk1 and non-mk1 version of a weapon in my possession, then I only "need" to level the non-mk1 version because it's a better weapon? You mention mk1 being cheap, so if it's a cost thing then that would suggest to me that it doesn't matter which of the two I rank up because I already have the non-mk1 version.
I realize based on some of the responses that people are probably laughing at my ineptness, but what no one seems to be clarifying is whether I *need* to rank up *both versions*. Are you saying that eventually we encounter less and less new equipment to rank up in order to increase MR and therefore any mk1 equipment unranked would be the only thing left to rank? Part of my confusion is that I'm only MR3 and I have no idea what endgame levelling looks like in this game. From my perspective there seem to be so many weapons, etc. in this game that I'd never run out of stuff to rank up for XP. I'm guessing that thinking is wrong?
And no, Mk-1 weapons are DIFFERENT than the normal versions. They both grant XP if leveled. The only difference is that the former is weaker and you should just ditch them after you're done leveling them.
As for why it's cheap: It literally is. It costs what, 25K to buy from the market directly.