Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=rx+560&_sop=15 Be suspicious that these models may be nerfed versions, such as 2gb, "14CU", 75w/45w vs 90w(you want this or greater) Spend $50-75 tops (North America)
https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2334524.m570.l1313.TR12.TRC2.A0.H0.Xi5-2500.TRS0&_nkw=i5-2500&_sacat=164&LH_TitleDesc=0&LH_PrefLoc=3&_sop=15&_osacat=164&_odkw=core+i5+sandy+bridge&_dcat=164&rt=nc&Socket%2520Type=LGA%25201155%252FSocket%2520H2 For Sandy Bridge users, don't spend more than $30 and if I'm honest, be picky about shipping
These are two examples of what will make the most impact to playing the game. If you're on Intel HD graphics and your processor is undeniably bad(2 cores, less than 3.0Ghz, pre-6000 or Skylake architecture), make an effort to keep the potato functioning! It's a not so serious investment for enjoyable 1080p60hz gaming.
The only purpose of this comment is to let everyone know about the current Okay-value entry-level components, at least on the market-level. You yourself should research how these components can make a significant impact to any budget PC that does not have a dedicated graphics card. You will want to have a 64-bit operating system installed and quadruple-check that you are purchasing compatible parts, or the necessary adapters to make everything work!!!
X9 is complete garbage, it pretty much made AMDanything unusable and capped performance for heaps of games. The only issues with newer versions are the developers havnt properly coded compatibility....
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ you don’t know a thing about anything, do you know what AMD is? It’s a brand of computer hardware, which a LOt of people use ( not as much as nvdia), back in 9 days people with any AMD card weren’t able to play most games properly, 9 was terrible, also direct X isn’t an engine....... just get off this forum.
games are optimzed for this, and newer ones, simply because it just does more, and better
Lol you’re such a pc cry baby. I’m just calling people out for spouting nonsense they know nothing about, nothing wrong with the truth. Also, cpu bottlenecking gpu performance is beyond irrelevant for warframe....
You could kindly correct the lad's views of the aged API, but you've chosen a hostile and similarly ignorant path of calling him stupid while using inaccurate terms to describe what an API is, how CPUs interact with APIs and GPUs, and ultimately how AMD's GPUs have fared in competition over the years.
This is inherently false, as you're stating subjective reasoning as fact.
While Warframe is not Ashes of the Singularity, anyone with any knowledge of how bottlenecking works will know that the following statement holds true and is a feasible basis for my post:
Any Sandy Bridge CPUs or earlier will bottleneck an RX 560(originally posted this backwards af), as well as modern Celerons to some extent(in the form of stutter) at 1080p. Resolution is also important; lowering resolution would increase CPU load to some degree, as well. So, it is absolutely relevant in Warframe and beyond that, where users might play other games or do something other than play Warframe with their computers; imagine that.
Dude - that was *AMD's* fault. That's the price you pay for their 'lower price' - not very good support.
You can't blame it on Nvidia either - Dx is a Microsoft thing. AMD just screwed up their support for its implementation.