安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Since then I've upgraded parts (had to switch out for a new motherboard to support) and now roughly match your specs. Though, something tells me that not having a GPU and having integrated might be the issue.
Some games are CPU intensive (like Minecraft) some are not. If you are using an integrated graphics card, that's on you. My laptop (also integrated) can run the S.T.A.L.K.E.R trilogy, but can't run System Shock 2 (1999) due to fps in the single digits.
I don't think you understand that Warframe has hordes of entities at any given moment, including lots of enemies, each enemy made up of different parts, and all parts having a surface PLUS reflections. Shoving all rendering through your CPU is great when it comes to simple and basic that doesn't have complex surfaces (like MineCraft) but as soon as you get into more complex games it will just start crashing computers.
Fact of the matter is Warframe is very well done when it comes to optimization. Just because you can't really run it without a dedicated GPU (as opposed to integrated) doesn't mean it's bad. It's a more efficient engine that can't be run through your CPU.
EDIT: No offense, but saying you can run something that utilizes the Unreal Engine on integrated is bull. Unless you're talking about the iterations of the Unreal Engine that have been around almost 15 years more than Warframe.
"My cpu is a decade old and I use integrated GPU and I have 1 fps on open world maps. Obviously it's DE's fault for not degrading the game's quality to levels of ♥♥♥♥ so people with trash cans can play."
Wouldn't more RAM allow more processes to occur, and therefore higher framerates and less lag due to processes throttling?
Would allowing a larger amount of memory to be utilised by a game mean that stuff is loaded in just for the sake of it?
When a computer uses ram it copies data from your HD and then uses it for calculations. It can also do calculations from the HD... there is a balance. This is why you hear some games are more "CPU intensive".. it is actually faster to run calculations directly rather than using RAM all the time. Ram is used for things that will get "loaded in" and used frequently rather than having to go to the HD for everything. If you want a better answer I suggest you look up how computers work, my last "class" on computers was back in the 70's on a magnetic tape machine and punch cards. But I do know loading stuff into ram just to load it into ram isn't a great idea. Not that I am being sarcastic but it really isn't my job to educate you on how computers work... I was trying to provide an answer that might encourage you to look it up yourself.
My initial point was I believed there was a cap of a gigabyte of RAM that can be utilised by the game, and that being less limited might improve performance. But from what you're saying I gather Warframe doesn't use a significant enough amount of RAM as it uses the processor instead.