Bientôt l'été
Substance Ontology for a Cosmopolitan Bourgeoisie
As many of you I encountered the artificial intelligence and was unable to best its application of post-structural linguistics. At every turn I found myself subjected to a dialog that was profoundly disturbing which if I am to understand Lacanian psychoanalysis properly, came to enjoy as a manner and extension of the game.

After this realization I came to wonder, and eventually resolved, why it was that I found this game so unmatched in its presentation -- it is the substance ontology of a cosmopolitan bourgeoisie.

There they engage in this digital field, aimlessly embodying the transcendental human experience, exclaiming to themselves "This is what interaction amounts to; a game theory of chess and the parries of regular 21st century parlance and nomenclature." Smug and content the player makes a category error in assuming that this is "beyond" or too "meta" for the proletarian mind.

From here we see, it is that this game is the ontological groundwork of the cosmopolitan bourgeois.
< >
กำลังแสดง 1-10 จาก 10 ความเห็น
You're speakin' in fancy!
You shoudl totally stay away from that Substance.
This is exquisitely totalizing...

But I think you need to go back to Hegel and generic ontology. Or you know what, no you're right. Nevermind.

EDIT:
Also, way to fetishize the rhizome.
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย 50,000 lbs.; 6 ก.พ. 2013 @ 10: 38pm
As a freelance psychoanalyst, I can confirm these suspicions to be well-founded and accurate.
TK, I've read Hegel enough to conclude his dialectical process does not yield an end of history. Works like "Bientôt l'été" demonstrate the dialectic is an ongoing phenomenological occurence even in our contemporary post-structuralist environment. True dat Doctor Science! I wonder what Zizek would make of this swill?
I find this whole conversation to be demeaning. Plus I find the idea of thinking that this petty bourgeoisie crap is anything other than elitist rhetoric designed only make themselves feel like they are enlightened.
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย [IN D] RobbinxDeHood; 6 ก.พ. 2013 @ 10: 46pm
Exactly my point RobbinxDeHood.
Shh, stop perpetuating the myth that you can BS your way through humanities classes by writing like this. Now when all of these kids flunk their Comparative Literature 101 class they're just going to cry about how they only failed because essay grading is "totally subjective".
I thought this was funny. Wasn't I supposed to? Now I just feel like crying.
:D THAT WAS HILARIOUS.
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย Spunky McGoo™; 10 ก.พ. 2013 @ 7: 52am
< >
กำลังแสดง 1-10 จาก 10 ความเห็น
ต่อหน้า: 1530 50