安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
0 
举报此帖
This may be true. Its not the engine, but the devs lack of ability/knowledge in how to optimize things well using it.
If thats the case, performance is such a wide spread issue in Unity games you would THINK that the Unity team would do a better job at helping developers understand how to work with it better (which ultimately is still a fail on the Unity teams part).
Name a game with huge map, large number of players, modern graphics, and runs butter smooth under unity.
Unity cinematics are not even released to public unlike Unreal cinematics. They are using bunch of hyper optimization to have these cinematics while UE provides such level out of box
Unreal Engine is an open source cpp project. You can build it on Linux perfectly fine.
As a game dev I prefer UE for multiple reasons. It is faster, has far more features, is full open source and much better business plan. Not to mention pace of development on UE is much-much greater than that of Unity. Epic games are pouring that endless Fortnite money into UE and it shows.
Why Unity? Its becasue devs are unexperienced and it is much easier to learn Unity. Which is not a good sign for such an ambitious MMO project.
No it's absolutely justified. Unity is a crap game engine, one of the worst there is in fact. However it's popular because it's easy to make a game with for VERY inexperienced developers. It's like making a rpg with rpg maker, can it make a rpg? Yes it can, and it's easy to do so. But the game will be badly limited as a result and unlikely to ever be "great".
Unity does have some good games made with it, but thats more of a factor of luck than the engine. Success through volume. In simple terms, Unity is good for LEARNING game development, it was never really meant for making AAA quality games. But once a game made with it was moderately successful, they tried to advertise it as a high end game engine, WHICH IT IS NOT. And once they tried to monetize it as if it was a proper AAA game engine everyone revolted and abandoned it. (The games you see being made with it now, were in production before everyone gave unity the middle finger, so they are stuck with this garbage till release.)
Please do your research next time before shootin' yer mouth off.
Because they have a huge asset store.