Outdated Graphics

[White Lion]

It's 2024 and this game is still using technology which existed in the early 2010.
Dude, UE5 is already available in the market. Move on to the future dude!

[Charsiew]

Look at EDF iron rain.

[>-FISH-D]

Originally posted by Jade:

It's 2024 and this game is still using technology which existed in the early 2010.
Dude, UE5 is already available in the market. Move on to the future dude!

Dude you are talking about Japanese devs. Also I think there are only 5 of them.

[ImHelping]

On the off chance you are not just joking around OP. Some of us remember the issues with Inscect Armageddon.

IA had better (for the time) graphics, as a "USA makes an EDF game with modern visuals wow" attempt at the franchise.

You fought basically ♥♥♥♥ all. In fact the final level where the game just... ends. is barely touching the amount of enemies and UFO sky death a normal mission in a standard EDF game has.

Traditional EDF sticks with cheap "Did they make this in MS paint?" blood splatters and jittery bugs, and stretchy rubber band leg robots that look like a graphics error when hit with rapid fire weapons, because that lets the devs vomit out 50-100 of them from monster spawners and in turn, not set your hardware on literal fire when dozens of mechs start punching dozens of kaiju while you rain orbital lasers on everything.

It is an unironic, "We play it for the gameplay, not the graphics" situation. Where long time fans can admit the graphics are comparative garbage without feeling sad about it. (spot the casuals who get actually mad about it hoping for gamer cred!)

Because otherwise, you can't get so many ragdolled firebreathing dragon corpses it obscures your body and most of your screen.

[AlexWolf]

Not everything in this life is graphics my friend, it seems stupid to me that people ask for graphics in games instead of playability and fun.

[Charsiew]

Originally posted by AlexWolf:

Not everything in this life is graphics my friend, it seems stupid to me that people ask for graphics in games instead of playability and fun.

That's what 'modern' gamers looking for. Look at call of duty.

[Purple Sauce]

Originally posted by Charsiew:

Originally posted by AlexWolf:

Not everything in this life is graphics my friend, it seems stupid to me that people ask for graphics in games instead of playability and fun.

That's what 'modern' gamers looking for. Look at call of duty.

I think it's funny because in another thread someone called others sheep for buying this, and that person had several CoD titles and not the old ones, the new ones 🤣 You can't make this up man! I want a game that's good and that is fun, this game meets that requirement. CoD does not unless I'm playing the original Blops.

[AlexWolf]

Originally posted by Charsiew:

Originally posted by AlexWolf:

Not everything in this life is graphics my friend, it seems stupid to me that people ask for graphics in games instead of playability and fun.

That's what 'modern' gamers looking for. Look at call of duty.

yes good graphics, bad gameplay and nothing fun

[Charsiew]

Originally posted by Purple Sauce:

Originally posted by Charsiew:

That's what 'modern' gamers looking for. Look at call of duty.

I think it's funny because in another thread someone called others sheep for buying this, and that person had several CoD titles and not the old ones, the new ones 🤣 You can't make this up man! I want a game that's good and that is fun, this game meets that requirement. CoD does not unless I'm playing the original Blops.

Wish he give those money to sandlot for more budget & release more games.

[Charsiew]

Originally posted by AlexWolf:

Originally posted by Charsiew:

That's what 'modern' gamers looking for. Look at call of duty.

yes good graphics, bad gameplay and nothing fun

Well their fun is online pvp, lobby cursing, tea bagging in match, mom calling. What else I miss?

[White Lion]

Originally posted by >-FISH-D:

Originally posted by Jade:

It's 2024 and this game is still using technology which existed in the early 2010.
Dude, UE5 is already available in the market. Move on to the future dude!

Dude you are talking about Japanese devs. Also I think there are only 5 of them.

Yes, this is the consequence of 5 people trying to be 5 supermen.

Indie developers with less than 10 people and tried to be supermen often fail to deliver 5 star quality in ambitious games. It's a chronic mental disease in the gaming industry.

They should have stick to simple games but with 5-star quality. For example "Eastshade". Very simple but 5-star quality.

[White Lion]

Originally posted by ImHelping:

On the off chance you are not just joking around OP. Some of us remember the issues with Inscect Armageddon.

IA had better (for the time) graphics, as a "USA makes an EDF game with modern visuals wow" attempt at the franchise.

You fought basically ♥♥♥♥ all. In fact the final level where the game just... ends. is barely touching the amount of enemies and UFO sky death a normal mission in a standard EDF game has.

Traditional EDF sticks with cheap "Did they make this in MS paint?" blood splatters and jittery bugs, and stretchy rubber band leg robots that look like a graphics error when hit with rapid fire weapons, because that lets the devs vomit out 50-100 of them from monster spawners and in turn, not set your hardware on literal fire when dozens of mechs start punching dozens of kaiju while you rain orbital lasers on everything.

It is an unironic, "We play it for the gameplay, not the graphics" situation. Where long time fans can admit the graphics are comparative garbage without feeling sad about it. (spot the casuals who get actually mad about it hoping for gamer cred!)

Because otherwise, you can't get so many ragdolled firebreathing dragon corpses it obscures your body and most of your screen.

Yes, this is the consequence of 5 people trying to be 5 supermen.

Indie developers with less than 10 people and tried to be supermen often fail to deliver 5 star quality in ambitious games. It's a chronic mental disease in the gaming industry.

They should have stick to simple games but with 5-star quality. For example "Eastshade". Very simple but 5-star quality.

[White Lion]

Originally posted by AlexWolf:

Not everything in this life is graphics my friend, it seems stupid to me that people ask for graphics in games instead of playability and fun.

Outdated graphics is not the same as artistic graphics. Just look at Eastshade. That's 5-star quality game. Artistic graphics but very simple mechanics. Hence 5-star quality games.

[Purple Sauce]

Originally posted by Charsiew:

Originally posted by AlexWolf:

yes good graphics, bad gameplay and nothing fun

Well their fun is online pvp, lobby cursing, tea bagging in match, mom calling. What else I miss?

I mean if I want that I could just play halo, except halo is fun 😂

[White Lion]

Originally posted by AlexWolf:

Originally posted by Charsiew:

That's what 'modern' gamers looking for. Look at call of duty.

yes good graphics, bad gameplay and nothing fun

Outdated graphics is not the same as artistic graphics. Just look at Eastshade. That's 5-star quality game. Artistic graphics but very simple mechanics. Hence 5-star quality game.

[Pekora]

Originally posted by Jade:

It's 2024 and this game is still using technology which existed in the early 2010.
Dude, UE5 is already available in the market. Move on to the future dude!

This man is not worthy of your rewards give them unto me so that he might be more mad at the lack of his awards.