Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
BG2 has more choices, albeit not so much, on evil route, it’s all mostly normal stuff on the quests until you get to the finishing line of the few quests that gives you choices to “pursue” other choices.
Maybe I want to be a good person but play a no-nonsense jackass.
Maybe I want to be "evil" but in a way that makes sense, like I'm not going to explode a characters spine unless they directly got in my way or didn't heed my warning.
I know I'm asking for too much but I don't think a game has pulled off being a bad/evil character right. Someone said Pathfinder Wrath of the Righteous pulls off being an evil Lich and how people react to you while still being your followers.
In Tyranny it was really pretty good to play an evil Character.
It would actually be fun to play an evil character IF you could do something cool like that.
All the evil choices usually start as a fetch quest and the evil deed is just keeping the items for oneself.