Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This was literally a motion video game, it was like a cartoon that was written and animated. If I had to guess, like many films that were shot and produced, the FPS on it, is much lower then 120FPS.
The video was telecined to 30 fps for the original laserdisc master, but you cannot see more frames than were drawn by the artists.
FPS are kind of irrelevant with this game. They animated it at a set FPS way back in 1983, so regardless of how fast or slow your computer is, it will be stuck at that FPS.
Indeed, there really isn't any "FPS" to it because there's nothing to render. It's simply playing videos that branch depending on what buttons you hit. Kind of like playing a DVD.
That said...I don't know what FPS it was animated at. The animation was done by Don Bluth back in 1983. 24FPS is pretty standard for movies and TV shows...but it wasn't necessarily *animated* at that speed. As a person above me said, 12FPS is probably about right for the actual number of drawn frames.
Ironically, modern PC's are more than capable of reproducing the entire game in real time 3D (using cell shading to make it look like the original). It would be interesting if someone would do that someday, it would enable you to run it at 60FPS and would look a lot smoother.