Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
Using YNAB 5 is like a financial IQ test, if you sign up you failed.
I love some of the new changes after reading them. At first I was mad because I don't want a recurring fee when I am trying to save money. I had not purchased it yet and was using the trial. After reading some of the updates and changes I love them. It will be a lot easier for my wife to follow wich will save me way more than $45 a year.
Why not?
As far as I'm aware a personal budget is a finance plan that allocates future personal income towards expenses, savings and debt repayment.
At what point does someone budgeting money towards a software based expense suddenly turn into not budgetting properly?
I subscribe to spotify, I used netflix for a few months, I subscribe to subnetting.net and now I subscribe to ynab, although I honestly just paid the $45 for the year.
I put all of these expenses in my budget, and allocate funds from my income to cover them.
I'm going to go a step further and argue that what I'm doing is called budgeting, and accusing anyone who willingly pays for things they find value in as 'not budgetting properly' as if the only way to budget is to eliminate everything until you're left with the bare basics to survive is actually the one 'not budgetting properly'.
Have at you.
All you've told me is you waste money, congradulations if that's what you were going for, you're just a typical american consumer.
This is literally no different, they've just amorized the cost of the new version to $5 / month instead of a bigger payment for a large upgrade.
Or you can stick to the old version. Exactly the same as before.
The only thing that has changed here is that now it's a web app. If you dislike that, okay, cool. But complaining about having to pay more than once just means you had no idea how it already worked.
For those of us willing to give a little bit of money regularly (or $45 a year, since they're giving a discount to existing users), we just get updates faster than we used to. Which isn't a bad deal, in my opinion.
How about this for a test of logic:
Example: Using YNAB helps me manage my money better and I save $100 a year (could be on interest, or not paying late fees, or just being more aware of spending patterns. . whatever)
It now costs $45 a year or $5 a month.
I am still $65 ahead, per year, from when I wasn't using it.
I also hate the idea of a subscrition and I get how that might not make "financial sense". If, however, I benefit from it, then it makes a lot of sense.
Anything you do that costs less than it helps you save means you are making a good choice. Maybe there are better choices but I would hardly think it is faiing.
I'll stick to YNAB 4 until it dies and then ... I'll find something else.
It. Was. Never. A. One. Time. Payment.
If there wasn't a subscription service, there would instead be a YNAB 5, and you would have to pay for that or stick with the old version. That's how they've always done it. You never got major version upgrades for free.
Now they can iterate faster (I think everybody likes that), and it's on the web (some people don't like that). That's all that has changed. (Well, that's all that has changed with the payment and delivery model - the actual software and method have changed considerably.) And people can upgrade, or not, just as they've always done in the past.
There are a lot of people here who apparently just had no idea what they were buying when they bought YNAB.