Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Totaly agree.
All right, you've convinced me. I'll give it another shot.
Fez feels just right.
Can I recommend something to you? Don't go into games with expectations of what they should be, or are. Let the game be what it is. If you don't like the idea of a game being about cracking ciphers, meta-puzzles, etc., then that's fine, but don't try to force the game into this box you created for it and then point at it and say "I DON'T LIKE THIS GAME BECAUSE IT DOESN'T FIT INTO THIS BOX".
I can understand how people might like this kind of game, but that's a big disapointement for me.
And a big huzzah for the QR codes... -_-
Its kind of sad, I like the game but it could have been so much better with some good puzzles made by for example that guy from "Increpare games". This guy is a master at creating good puzzles.
And regarding the QR codes, he's also stated there are alternate ways to get the solutions to the puzzles in the game, they're just a bit harder and require some more thinking. He simply wanted to include something lots of people were using nowadays, as part of the very meta approach this game has.
Now people take it as a personal insult because information is so readily available.