Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
300 points of difference is only a little over 1% of difference for that score and is likely within natural variance. So, that by itself is not troubling imo.
Also, regular Time Spy is too low difficulty for a 4080 system. If you didn't know, Time Spy Extreme is a better benchmark for your system.
1% difference is still well within usual margin of error, but of course if this is easily repeatable, it may be quite real. Problem here is that 4080 is so fast that Time Spy is CPU limited, so small differences in things like your background programs using more CPU can dip the score in this test. This is why we are replacing Time Spy with Steel Nomad. It is just too lightweight for modern high end GPUs.
Agree; I have had similar results here -- I'm going to compare 551.86 to 552.44 this weekend to see if the trend goes back even further, but 552.44 drivers have been outstanding for everything on my 4090.
Edit: got a little bit of an overall score bump with 551.86 versus 552.44, not really enough to justify switching, but some of the scores were nice.
It's the same with me, every driver above 552.44 are underperforming, and it's showing in my games as well.