Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The main reason for run that shows hardware information but no monitoring data is that the monitoring routine crashes during the run. This can be either due to slightly unstable system (usually verified by dropping overclock and then, hey, now it works) or conflict with another application that pokes same low level hardware bits for monitoring and causes a problem.
In some rare cases motherboard BIOS bugs can cause problems. BIOS update or turning off fancy kinda-overclocking features that vendors add to motherboards these days can help.
Well Karhu ramtest passes, y-crunch passes, prime95 passes. I was not guessing. Im 100% certain without any doubt what so ever.
But there are more issues to 3dmark then just broken monitoring, the website at certain times of day will refuse to load. Doesn't matter which pc load it from or mobile. It's mostly responsive, but not always.
And there's a few out there who've also had the same experience. It's a great tool for benching, but it could be better.
In any case, when the tool says result valid, but still lacks monitoring data, are you really going to believe it's not your programming that's at fault? It's either valid or it's not.