安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
I'll leave this up in case anyone else has that question!
It's impossible.
perhaps you`d like to tell my rx 7900 xtx nitro+ that:
https://www.3dmark.com/tsst/4176062
https://www.3dmark.com/tsst/4176584
https://www.3dmark.com/swst/146457
i`m sure ulead will be able to verify the scores.
i have a few more somewhere but i really can`t be arsed to dig them out.
A avg clock of 1.4GHz on a 2.5+GHz GPU (TSS) looks very much like a FPS/Power Limiter to me.
if it was that easy to manipulate everyone would have a 100per and it would render ul`s entire business redundant.
if it is that easy, prove it: put your results up here.
i hate it when people do that just so`s it looks like they`re always right.
i have no particular computer skills and i got 99% entirely by chance- i`d just said to myself oh that`s good- i`ve never got even close before- does it go up to 100? and five minutes later it did.
it`s a brand new card, new build, default settings all the way from bios to adrenaline.
i still see no point in ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ around to get that score and i hope that ul are aware of the exploits and have some kind of answer- i`d love to hear their views on this. maybe they`ll spot my og post.
congrats to hyperspace, btw for proving their point! i stand corrected.
i do tweak my system`s bios ect as a general rule, but thanks anyway man
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/103290871?
here in oc just 5% less from best score:
https://www.3dmark.com/pr/2245337
I see from some result of 100% that ram speed is 2133Mhz (maybe more stable) even if all the rest is of high end quality, This ram speed appears to slow for a real gaming pc but nice for a graphic station. Stability is not an hardware running at 100% of full capabilities and operanting system must to be complete out of any other task running during benchmark, if yes 100% is possible, 99,99% is the result of regular performance of a good setup even if my mobo was very cheap and OS not with full optimization (win11 pro regualr version not a custom one).
You can set up framerate cap in drivers or third party utility.
You can start the test when GPU is "warm" so any thermal throttling is already done.
But if you want to use the test for what it was designed for - to figure out how much your GPU thermal throttles under sustained load - you should start the test when the GPU is cold and without any "tweaks". Run like this and you will find out how much the performance can drop during sustained use.
0-3% is drop is considered normal and acceptable - there is always some variance and modern GPUs allow peak turbo clocks that are sustainable only for a very short time. Very well cooled GPU usually shows 99-98%.
3-10% drops (so, < 97% and as far down as 90%) have been observed, especially in laptops, due to the GPU cooling being, by design, not quite able to keep the GPU operating at same level of turbo clocks as when cold. If seeing less than 97% on a desktop system, case cooling may be inadequate or the GPU model in question has less than stellar cooler. In some cases it is also possible that heatsink is not properly seated or thermal paste has gone bad. If you can find someone else with the exact same card model, could ask what he gets out of the test to determine if the issue is with the outright cooler design ("working as intended by the GPU manufacturer") or possibly issue with the individual card (bad cooler mounting, bad paste)
Values lower than 90% generally tend to indicate something is quite wrong with the cooling. I'm not aware of any "out of the box" designs that allow over 10% thermal throttling when everything is working as intended by the manufacturer.
But, once again: The % value is meaningful only if the test is started from a "cold" state, ie. system has been sitting idle for a good while before starting.
you are right, the perfect match is to run the test one time only at cold, like i did it during mine stability test posted. When i repeat it several times my score is between 99,4% and 99,8%. rarely 99,9% again because i'm not put any cap framerate and by software i just close unessential programs plus i stop antivirus and windows update. The only things that i do on cpu with Amd PBO overclocking settings are to set the parameters for undervolting it (PPT, Cpu max power and SOC) plus manual negative voltage control and Curve optimized setup for any core. Anyway there is a long job to calibrate the cpu efficency more than gpu one to reach the goal of a stable computer for all kind of task that is not producing a lot of heat only.
This is my old pc, where i did with Inlel i7 4770K and SLI 2xGTX770 (both overclocked) the top score on Time Spy:
https://www.3dmark.com/search#advanced?test=spy%20P&cpuId=1605&gpuId=869&gpuCount=2&gpuType=ALL&deviceType=ALL&storageModel=ALL&memoryChannels=0&country=&scoreType=overallScore&hofMode=false&showInvalidResults=false&freeParams=&minGpuCoreClock=&maxGpuCoreClock=&minGpuMemClock=&maxGpuMemClock=&minCpuClock=&maxCpuClock=