Better than 99% of all results.....

[!🔷N͓̽E͓̽O͓̽N͓̽🔷!]

Nice

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/58791267?

https://tweakers.net/i/QVbEIszED8ar5UpLmieV66gjboQ=/full-fit-in/4920x3264/filters:max_bytes(3145728):no_upscale():strip_icc():fill(white):strip_exif()/f/image/52JEXBF07WPzfs1b8w1JoVzj.jpg?f=user_large

[FuLong]

Congrats man you have a very nice build I would sell my soul for it xD

[xSOSxHawkens]

Lets see a more valid benchmark though... Cloud Gate cant be used to measure new hardware, too light a load that is all CPU dependent at that point...

[!🔷N͓̽E͓̽O͓̽N͓̽🔷!]

Diposting pertama kali oleh xSOSxHawkens:

Lets see a more valid benchmark though... Cloud Gate cant be used to measure new hardware, too light a load that is all CPU dependent at that point...

True, but theres nothing stopping other people from running the benchmark to, so ...still 99% better than the rest...

[xSOSxHawkens]

Diposting pertama kali oleh ★👑𝓑.𝓞.𝓢.𝓢👑:

Diposting pertama kali oleh xSOSxHawkens:

Lets see a more valid benchmark though... Cloud Gate cant be used to measure new hardware, too light a load that is all CPU dependent at that point...

True, but theres nothing stopping other people from running the benchmark to, so ...still 99% better than the rest...

Point is though that the score is meaningless. Reason being that at this point it is no longer GPU bound, and is entirely CPU bound. Being entirely CPU bound on a benchmark *meant* to show mainly GPU differentiation is why the benchmark is no longer valid or used.

I could use a more powerfull GPU (and in fact have done so) and yet bench lower in this specific test due to no reason other than CPU, which would be OK if the test were centered on CPU performance, but that is not the point of the test, its main purpose is to compare GPU loading.

Same thing is (starting) to happen to Firestrike standard as well, though that only applies to high end cards (read 3070+ and 6800+). It still does a decent job of sperating mid range and below, and FS Extreme/Ultra both do well as well.

Would be interested to see how the system you have benches out with a more modern and relevant bench!

[Migz - DH]

Cloud Gate has been out since 2013, so the vast majority of scores are from several years ago.

[!🔷N͓̽E͓̽O͓̽N͓̽🔷!]

Diposting pertama kali oleh xSOSxHawkens:

Diposting pertama kali oleh ★👑𝓑.𝓞.𝓢.𝓢👑:

Would be interested to see how the system you have benches out with a more modern and relevant bench!

Fire Strike Extreem: https://www.3dmark.com/fs/24995223

[Heaven Fall]

Why I have a lower score than you with a better hardware

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/58954212?
Maybe the CPU

[Migz - DH]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Ḩع Ꭿ℣₳ η ℱ Ꭿ ȴ:

Why I have a lower score than you with a better hardware

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/58954212?
Maybe the CPU

Looks like. 57.38 Physics fps vs. 63.93 fps.

Anyone know what the "Time measuring inaccurate" error is about?

[Heaven Fall]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Migz - DH:

Diposting pertama kali oleh Ḩع Ꭿ℣₳ η ℱ Ꭿ ȴ:

Why I have a lower score than you with a better hardware

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/58954212?
Maybe the CPU

Looks like. 57.38 Physics fps vs. 63.93 fps.

Anyone know what the "Time measuring inaccurate" error is about?

Physics fps mmmmmmmmmmmmm????? c'est quoi sa What is it ??????


And my 3mark is slow , take a long time to open and run a test
I have a high end config but is slow

[Migz - DH]

That is the CPU-specific test.

[Overclocked]

this test is for basic notebooks and is not even recommended for my system as its testing is pretty invalid, aka run timespy instead for a more true result thats more meaningful for comparison with todays technology

[Bad_Conduct]

Diposting pertama kali oleh !🔷N͓̽E͓̽O͓̽N͓̽🔷!:

Nice :rockparty:

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/58791267?

https://tweakers.net/i/QVbEIszED8ar5UpLmieV66gjboQ=/full-fit-in/4920x3264/filters:max_bytes(3145728):no_upscale():strip_icc():fill(white):strip_exif()/f/image/52JEXBF07WPzfs1b8w1JoVzj.jpg?f=user_large

The new AMD CPU's beat out my older TR1920x by a fair amount, although I find enabling SLI really hurts my combined scores for whatever reason.
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/59329850?


In Firestrike Extreme
SLI 1080's are much faster, but you physics score is way ahead
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/59330089?

I've got a 6800 XT coming Friday, I'll see what that looks like.