Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This error generally means "there are more than one timer on your system. They are now disagreeing how long the test took to run, so we cannot validate that the score is legit. We do not know if a second was actually a second, so frames per second may or may not be right".
Most common way of getting this is by adjusting bus clock speed outside BIOS. Windows 10/8.1 is not set up to react to that correctly. This is different from how things were back during Windows 7 day.
If in doubt, reset all settings to default and re-start OCing from a known good state.
Also please do not threaten review bombing because you do not fully understand everything about the benchmark or overclocking. We fully stand behind our product and help if you ask for it; threats are not needed.
I didn't change anything except Precision which a great many people use I am sure. It does nothing but let you overclock the VRAM and GPU with slider bars. It isn't fancy. I wasn't changing a whole bunch of voltages.
Here is two invalid scores:
http://www.3dmark.com/pr/23822
http://www.3dmark.com/pr/23819
Here is a valid score:
http://www.3dmark.com/pr/23798
http://www.3dmark.com/pr/23798
These were back to back. Meaning right after another. Just now. This also was after installing the latest Nvidia drivers which I did not want to do. Just in case that was the issue.
Valid: http://www.3dmark.com/pr/24142
Invalid: http://www.3dmark.com/pr/24144
Real time clock 141.0
Local time 139.722
Tick count 140.484
Up to 1.3 second difference between the timers. Something about your motherboard or the OC settings is messing things up.
And on one of your validated runs
Real time clock 140.0
Local time 139.677
Tick count 140.438
This one is marginally accepted.
On a system without unstable bus clock, those values should not be off by more than 0.1 - 0.2 seconds.
Edit: And to clarify, if you touch bus clock from Windows, you are going to mess up these timers and cause score to be wrong (and invalid). You can do it only from BIOS.
That's likely your problem, it might be dynamically changing the bus speed or have chosen unoptimal settings. Try manually setting your overclock in the BIOS using just the CPU multiplier and stock voltages.
In a benchmark that measures "frames per second" that is critical.
I have 9900k and 32 Gb 3200 RAM with RTX 2080ti.
My point is that my system is running stable. I have no problems with anything else. My computer has been running this way practically since I built it. I had to change the settings back after updating the BIOS a few times but that is it. Maybe they should loosen up the calculation requirements in the app.
3DMark is not the only benchmarking program I use. I use like dozens of them. I guess 3DMark is something special because none of the others fail. I paid money for this so I am not happy. Again this should be about pushing FPS not stability. We are trying to beat a score. Non of the "Kings" are going to run there systems at 6Gz on ice or nitrogen for any length of time therefore stability should be the least issue. If the test finishes then the score should stick. Period. That is how I see it.
There is nothing I can do to "fix" your issue. Your motherboard timers are not in sync.
If you reset all overclocking, does the problem go away? If it does, it is related to your overclocking and unfortunately that is something that is always up to the user. Hardware vendors do not guarantee overclocking and we cannot guarantee overclocking.
How does one fix motherboard timers? Does this have to do with the CPU, RAM and does overclocking the video card effect this?
I am simply changing the CPU multipler to 50(9900k retail boxed version not OEM) and the DDR4 RAM to 3600 from 3200. Most everything is on auto except I enabled all cores open and multi-threading. That is about as basic as one can get. I have an Aorus Master MB which is made for overclocking. How far off do the timers have to be to trash a score? We are talking about what? 1-2 fps maybe. I just can't see how that can kill a score when a system is visually stable. I can't even find a utility to messure what you are talking about. Therefore, I can not investigate how to improve what you are saying except not overclocking. Lol. Again this is an example of your app not being friendly to a lot of basic users. People overclock to beat scores. You are saying don't overclock now....because my app won't let you. Sad.
Or run a mini test before the Port Royal (since that is the only one giving me an issue) to check timings and then make an offset algorithm like noise cancellation to adjust the score a bit. I am not a programmer but that is a suggestion.
Dynamic OC modes where BIOS does whatever it wants to "improve" the OC are easy way to run into this problem. If it Dynamically bumps the bus clock, this definitely can explain it.
Like I said, Port Royal, being shorter than others, is bit more sensitive, but the difference is not major.
Good way to debug:
- Write down all settings you have for your OC
- Run stock run, verify no timer issue
- Add one setting, repeat
Once you find which setting causes timer skew, leave that out and use all others. Then ask Gigabyte why that setting influences windows timers to no longer run in sync with motherboard timers.
Motherboard manufacturers go to great lengths to try to find tiny gains that would make their boards to look "the best" in motherboard reviews. They have cheated in the past and they may cheat again. In this case I would not be surprised if some setting has a baked "tweak" that is minor enough so it is not caught by 3DMark timer check in all old tests, but Port Royal, having released *after* the release of the motherboard, catches their "optimization". And that "optimization" gives them 0.2% higher scores or something - just within margin of error so 3DMark does not flag it, but enough so that when you have 10 boards with same chipset side by side, Gigabyte is "the best" by... 0.2%.
Remember that this issue also means your OS can no longer reliably tell time. Windows 10 can mask this by syncing the clock from the network repeatedly, but it is still a motherboard issue.
Just one last note if I didn't say it already. The only time I get this error though is from overclocking the video card not my motherboard. Would that have something to do with power versus voltages or something? Or could the card OC clash with the Motherboard trying to communicate with it at the higher speeds?
Regarding the oc'ing: The app software only has 4 settings I mess with. GPU clock speed, VRAM clock speed and the power bar which has to always go to max in order to get the most power draw. And the voltage slider which is upped by % not actual volts. Usually this can not go above 10% on air.
Thanks again for your time.