Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I upgraded my GPU from 1080ti to 4070 and my device from Quest 2 to 3.
My current rig:
- I7 Gen 11
- RTX 4070
- 64 GB RAM
- DCS is installed in M2
- Quest 3
From 1080 to 4070 the improvement was the smooth rendering of DLAA, able to use above low settings and support higher resolution of Quest 3.
Worth noting that I have been using OpenXR Toolkit for a while. Also that I see no difference between between mid and high textures, neither difference playing between 72 and 90 HZ.
The only advice I can give to you?
Get a 2nd mortgage and but the best rig you can! :p
For VR?
I wouldn't recommend nothing less that a 3080 and I7 gen 10
Yah, I guess you didn't. The implication though for someone new to it is that it's a breeze to get it running at high settings. DCS VR is easily the most frustrating and 'difficult to get running smoothly' VR experience you will ever have. Every comment should come with this caveat 😉
Yes, this. Honestly I'd save up for a 4070+ and skip the 3000 series.
I've generally had it quite easy.
My G2 has mostly worked just fine.
Had perfectly fine performance.
With the pimax crystal.
Only thing I've done is set up PimaxXR and used Quadview to get eye tracking and foveated rendering. All my windows and nvida settings are now on default. No complex tweaking needed.
Would you please post the specs of your current rig?
In any I guess eye tracking should improve rendering prioritizing what you are looking at something that we certainly will never have in Quest.
i7 13700k, 3090, 64gig DDR5, Nvm 1TB
These are the settings I fly in VR
The screen resolution doesn't matter in VR.
https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipNBq-OYHhN7iONYbSjfhlMkNH4o46Kj_pQw1C0XWoYgvRIjGU_eb5rJAQw_ob3tMw?key=N3VXWXNlbnZrZ0pDaFNVd3dHbm5pbGlFQ2hlNk1B
https://youtu.be/q3NRtTxpPQQ?si=mo7PV00Ex4VcuBIE
Sure you can fly about solo with decent fps. But dogfighting with any decent numbers is a different matter. Weather effects spank performance hard also. Shadows of any kind are not possible.
Some headsets can run at 45fps without destroying your retinas. Some need a constant 72-90fps to not look horrible. Ghosting and warping occurs below headset native refresh rate that makes WWII unplayable. Firing missiles from 10k distance at a dot is slightly more playable.
If you have money, get the very best hardware available now. Memory and CPU are also important for large missions.
Weigh your options and google each headset/brand you come across so you ultimately will make the smaller mistake. At this point, while the game does look stunning on my ♥♥♥♥♥♥ quest pro (which has its own issues, like disconnecting controllers), I'm wondering if trackIR would have been a better choice between the 2.
If you were to buy meta, don't expect support from them. They are lazy and useless. Good luck my friend, I hope your choice will work for you.
WOW!
Really bad experience with Meta headsets you may have!
Besides the recently problem Meta provoked with OpenXR I have been happy with Quest 2 and now Quest 3.
Of course I would rather prefer a Pimax Crystal but the price/features of Quest 3, IMHO, unbeatable.