Store Page
Homefront: The Revolution
All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos News Guides Reviews

Homefront: The Revolution

Store Page
View Stats:
Global Achievements
Amerikaner Oct 15, 2016 @ 5:42pm
How bad is this game?
The first one was a disaster. This one was not adverstised aT ALL. So how is it Mein Dear Kommunity?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 28 comments
MTL5 Oct 15, 2016 @ 5:50pm 
I recommend giving this a watch to understand how the two games differ. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzCpNgAhUmw tl;dr version is that they're complete opposites in terms of design. Old game controlled the player constantly. New game gives player heaps of freedom. So much freedom that some players get bored very quickly.
#1
Ace Oct 15, 2016 @ 7:15pm 
It was slow at first - but I ended up liking it and major bugs are fixed.

If you are the type of person who judges a game in the first 5-10 mins...you probably won't like it. If you are a bit more open minded then you should like it.
#2
Moderator Abuse Oct 15, 2016 @ 9:16pm 
Originally posted by MTL5:
I recommend giving this a watch to understand how the two games differ. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzCpNgAhUmw tl;dr version is that they're complete opposites in terms of design. Old game controlled the player constantly. New game gives player heaps of freedom. So much freedom that some players get bored very quickly.

WTF IS CONVOLATED

CONDOMINFLAtED
#3
Syntax Error Oct 15, 2016 @ 10:10pm 
Originally posted by Amerikaner:
The first one was a disaster. This one was not adverstised aT ALL. So how is it Mein Dear Kommunity?
I hated the first HF. It was every cliche thing that's wrong with SP campaigns: painfully linear, terrible AI NPCs who get in your way, you name it. I almost skipped HF:R until some friends played it during the free weekend and said they really liked it. I tried it and bought it.

HF:R is, well, if not "open world" then "open zone" and gives you flexibility in how to approach a situation. You're rarely saddled with NPC companions and when you are, they're bearable. There's also NPC generic guys you can recruit who are idiots but using them is optional. There's a weapon system that takes a little while to grow into and appreciate but turns out to be a rather nice compromise between "Two weapon slots" and a full arsenal. It doesn't break a lot of new ground: you'll immediately feel some UbiSoft rub-off with the map unlock locations and fort takeovers but it was consistently fun provided you like that style of game.

It's not perfect, of course. The story is somewhere between generic and trying too hard to make a point, as mentioned the generic NPC AI isn't great and it's repetitive but it's leagues better than the original game.
#4
code23 Oct 16, 2016 @ 12:51am 
it not bad but it feel like more of a indie video games fps game type XD and it good
#5
Ebon Wolf Oct 16, 2016 @ 8:27am 
It's just "bad" just painfully mediocre.
#6
peepo :] Oct 16, 2016 @ 11:14am 
Well i cant tell you since its not only frozen crashed but also gives me 20 frames on an above rec spec computer.
#7
Sabberschlonz Oct 17, 2016 @ 8:21am 
Its worth the money, I like it !!
#8
Covid-Trece Oct 18, 2016 @ 4:35am 
It would be better with a manual save system.
#9
Amerikaner Oct 18, 2016 @ 5:18am 
so from all the comments i can tell is no good to buy ,very small credible info that its good.

Ty KOMUNITAS i will look out there for the physical copy =)
#10
Silver Oct 18, 2016 @ 11:19am 
Originally posted by Ebon Wolf:
It's just "bad" just painfully mediocre.
Says the guy who doesnt have the game lol
#11
MTL5 Oct 18, 2016 @ 3:30pm 
Originally posted by Silver:
Originally posted by Ebon Wolf:
It's just "bad" just painfully mediocre.
Says the guy who doesnt have the game lol
In fairness, he might have owned the game and refunded it, or he might have owned it on consoles or something like that.
#12
Tig Ol' Bitties Oct 18, 2016 @ 3:54pm 
Originally posted by Amerikaner:
The first one was a disaster. This one was not adverstised aT ALL. So how is it Mein Dear Kommunity?

First game was an incredible amount of fun.

Second is an irrelevant and unsuccessful open world game without PvP multiplayer. Nobody asked for this.
#13
Tig Ol' Bitties Oct 18, 2016 @ 3:55pm 
Originally posted by Silver:
Originally posted by Ebon Wolf:
It's just "bad" just painfully mediocre.
Says the guy who doesnt have the game lol

Did you forget the free weekend already? There was plenty of sampling.
#14
MTL5 Oct 18, 2016 @ 4:56pm 
Originally posted by TIG:
Second is an irrelevant and unsuccessful open world game without PvP multiplayer. Nobody asked for this.
Homefront: TR was made by people who had no interest in the Homefront IP. It is intended to be "open world Half Life".

People asked for Crytek to stop making mostly linear games like Crysis 2 and Crysis 3 and go back to something like Crysis 1. Well, Homefront: TR is arguably a response to that. It's like Crysis 2, but now you can go wherever you want.

Nobody was asking for Far Cry 2, either. A game with almost no connections to Far Cry, and full of open world padding.
#15
< >
Showing 1-15 of 28 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Homefront: The Revolution > General Discussions > Topic Details
Date Posted: Oct 15, 2016 @ 5:42pm
Posts: 28

Discussions Rules and Guidelines