My RED DRAGON wishlist

[STAF | Thouwsand Leopardz]

Hello! I recently heard of a new Wargame comign up, and I wanted to post my ideas and wishes.

1. PLEASE feature REAL bombers like the B-52 or maybe the B1B Lancer aswell as russian bombers such as..... idk any at the moment
2. Rescue troops: Please feature helicopters or cars that can evac your infantry. In WAB, if the transport-vehicle was destroyed, you couldnt rescue your infantry with different vehicles, because they werent compatible or werent vehicles in the infantry class. Maybe you coul doffer points for evacuation of your troops.

3. Missiles: Maybe you could introduce short-range missiles launched on special pods or from bombers... from a Tu-22 for example.

4. Indepth bombing

[orcbuster]

1: nope

2: nope

3: well you'll get ASMs for Red dragon but thats about it as far as long range missiles goes.

4: meaning?

[Chestus]

no i agree there is enough bombs flying threw the air as it is

[Chestus]

i would like to see an Ambush/Camuflage/dig in button

[STAF | Thouwsand Leopardz]

tobynator님이 먼저 게시:

1: nope

2: nope

3: well you'll get ASMs for Red dragon but thats about it as far as long range missiles goes.

4: meaning?

Well, could you try to say why you disagree instead of saying "Nope", please?

[orcbuster]

I'm not disagreeing, just saying its not happening

[OpusTheFowl]

Darkthreader (4viationX)님이 먼저 게시:

Well, could you try to say why you disagree instead of saying "Nope", please?

Eugen is not trying to make a sim but they are striving for a health level of realism. Due to the nature of the battles (meeting engagements) strategic bombers would never be used.

[STAF | Thouwsand Leopardz]

OpusTheFowl님이 먼저 게시:

Darkthreader (4viationX)님이 먼저 게시:

Well, could you try to say why you disagree instead of saying "Nope", please?

Eugen is not trying to make a sim but they are striving for a health level of realism. Due to the nature of the battles (meeting engagements) strategic bombers would never be used.

Okay! Thanks for the quick answer, but I really hope they wil limplement them. Maybe they could could cost about 5000 points...

[Andrej]

nope

[Ultimaratio]

Better Infantry animation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Traffic Conez]

I would like trenches....You could totally recreate WWI with Wargame.....

[Cullen's Hound]

Also not going to happen

[OpusTheFowl]

Traffic Conez님이 먼저 게시:

I would like trenches....You could totally recreate WWI with Wargame.....

Close Combat would be better...WG is not suited for shallow depth warfare.

[Rex]

I would like a return of how infantry looked the first game. Circles look so stupid AND it is annoying how they die so easily because of it. I also wonder how difficult it would be to randomize races in skin tone to make them at least look like different people. I also would want bombers, but if they cost 5000 points, you will never have a game with them in being the points is harshly limited in startup. (that is another thing, gives players more control over their game and allow more startup points and ♥♥♥♥. People shouldn't have to hack to have dumb fun). I also would like to see players have the ability to have as many players they want on any map (and allow players to make 10 player games). Also the ability to customize camoflauge in units or something. I could go on, but I know absolutely nothing I want is going to happen.

[OpusTheFowl]

The shape is cosmetic. The hitbox is what determines death and that didn't change (pretty sure).
Skin tone is cosmetic and pointless. If you are that zoomed-in then you're not playing anyways.
Strategic bomber no...already mentioned why.
More game/lobby control...sure!
"dumb fun? Maybe the devs want to limit the amount of dumb...probably a good idea.
Camo mods are out I think.

[gamebiffa]

Well can we mix the maps/timeframes with the units and do the Vietnamese or Korean war?