Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://www.polygon.com/e3/22530969/rocksmith-plus-sequel-release-dates-platforms-pc-beta-registration
I hate it, but if a majority still goes with that........
"Rocksmith+ adds a subscription service to Ubisoft’s guitar tutorial series" .Key word
being ADDS Just my thoughts. signed up for the beta we'll see.No reason to get our panties in a wad just yet I really don't see how it could be much different other then some needed options and a face lift .
It also reads farther down the line Quote "Rocksmith+ will OFFER a subscription service, meaning players can pay a regular fee to access a library of songs rather than buying individual tracks as DLC."
Yeah, and IF there was an option to buy the game vs. a subscription, it's guaranteed to be insanely expensive.
Yeah but here is the thing, a large or small library doesn't mean the library will contain good music. Or fun to play songs for that matter.
Quality over quantity, always.
Out of all the songs that came with Rocksmith I enjoy about three of em.
And found about five more from DLC worth my time.....
I dont just play/learn Rocksmith songs for the sake of learning them. They have to be good songs.
I imagine there are crap ton of others out there like myself.