Linux port or Proton?

[Compatriot]

Please and thank you

[Heitor Villa-Lobos]

Ursprungligen skrivet av Patola Linux:

Ursprungligen skrivet av Heitor Villa-Lobos:

If you do all that only to tell people they should support Windows instead (...)

Also, you heavily underestimate others. I was using desktop android and also desktop Linux on ARM in 2011, I am no newbie in this regard. I know Android very well, I just don't like it. And although I consider the "GNU/Linux" nomenclature more technically correct, it's an awkward expression that harms debate. So I use Linux and everybody understands. Even you do, but you pretend you don't with these silly objections about Android "being Linux".

Android *is* Linux. It isn't "silly", it is the reality. Realizing this is very important, as there are, like I said before, more games for Linux-based OSs, than anything else. In fact, if you consider Unix-like in general (*BSD, MacOS and Switch OS included), one can easily see Unix-like OSs are already the preferable platform for gaming. This should not, in any way, be understated. PC gaming should be done on Unix-like, just like mobile and console gaming.

Now, if you know GNU/Linux is the more technically correct nomenclature, than you know that what harms debate is calling GNU (or GNU/Linux) just "Linux". If uou ever develop for IoT, mobile, and Linux modules, you'll understand that calling something else by the name of the kernel is confusing. Also, there are reasons why Microsoft and Bezos' company will preffer the market-oriented, dubious nomenclature: they want to stay as far as possible to Human Rights and liberties. They don't want copyleft or "viral" (GPL) licenses to pop up in conversations or in the thoughts of people. The wrong nomenclature is sterile on purpose. The only thing it is fertile for is heated discussions. If you want a short way of typing the name of the GNU/Linux operating system, you can call it "GNU".

Now "mobile desktop Linux" is just stupid.
You mean a mobile GNU-like.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Patola Linux:

I'm sorry that by reading this he must be thinking we're just lunatics.

Its what you're hoping for, I'm sure. I don't know what goes on in the head of a false flag guy, but I think you might work for Microsoft.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Patola Linux:

So even if you got what you want, it would be worthless.

To you, hater. I'll get to play the game.

[Jeanne]

Ursprungligen skrivet av Heitor Villa-Lobos:

Ursprungligen skrivet av Patola Linux:

Also, you heavily underestimate others. I was using desktop android and also desktop Linux on ARM in 2011, I am no newbie in this regard. I know Android very well, I just don't like it. And although I consider the "GNU/Linux" nomenclature more technically correct, it's an awkward expression that harms debate. So I use Linux and everybody understands. Even you do, but you pretend you don't with these silly objections about Android "being Linux".

Android *is* Linux. It isn't "silly", it is the reality. Realizing this is very important, as there are, like I said before, more games for Linux-based OSs, than anything else. In fact, if you consider Unix-like in general (*BSD, MacOS and Switch OS included), one can easily see Unix-like OSs are already the preferable platform for gaming. This should not, in any way, be understated. PC gaming should be done on Unix-like, just like mobile and console gaming.

Now, if you know GNU/Linux is the more technically correct nomenclature, than you know that what harms debate is calling GNU (or GNU/Linux) just "Linux". If uou ever develop for IoT, mobile, and Linux modules, you'll understand that calling something else by the name of the kernel is confusing. Also, there are reasons why Microsoft and Bezos' company will preffer the market-oriented, dubious nomenclature: they want to stay as far as possible to Human Rights and liberties. They don't want copyleft or "viral" (GPL) licenses to pop up in conversations or in the thoughts of people. The wrong nomenclature is sterile on purpose. The only thing it is fertile for is heated discussions. If you want a short way of typing the name of the GNU/Linux operating system, you can call it "GNU".

Now "mobile desktop Linux" is just stupid.
You mean a mobile GNU-like.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Patola Linux:

I'm sorry that by reading this he must be thinking we're just lunatics.

Its what you're hoping for, I'm sure. I don't know what goes on in the head of a false flag guy, but I think you might work for Microsoft.

Ursprungligen skrivet av Patola Linux:

So even if you got what you want, it would be worthless.

To you, hater. I'll get to play the game.

"You don't agree with me so you must be working for the enemy (Microsoft)." It's like the election is still in progress with this line of thinking. Just pure insinuation out of thin air.

[Yskar]

The game just have to run o Linux with enought optimization and good stability, i dont care even if it have to use real emulation or even use a virtual machine abstraction, if i can still play it in 10-15-20 years without devs intervetion, i think this is a correct approach.

For games everything else is schizo talk and irrelevant specially ideology.