i like this but i have a two MAJOR complaints

[Barney]

1(this is my opinion, should've stated that), please switch it to source 2 unreal is one of the worst engines out there. 2, please improve fps, i'm on a gtx 1660 (overkill for half life 2 at max settings and great for half life alyx) and i am getting 20 fps outdoors and 40 indoors. ᵃⁿᵈ ᵐᵃᵏᵉ ᵗʰᵉ ʰᵉᵃᵈᶜʳᵃᵇˢ ˡᵉˢˢ ᶜᵘᵗᵉ

[٫Ꝛ꭫]

What can be done in Source 2 that can't be done in UE? You guys are picking on the engine without even knowing why, just a bunch of cattle repeating what others say. For a project made by fans in their spare time, do you know enough people who use/work with Source as opposed to UE?

Stop whining without having a plausible argument about the engine.

[Barney]

Originally posted by ٫Ꝛ꭫:

What can be done in Source 2 that can't be done in EU? You guys are picking on the engine without even knowing why, just a bunch of cattle repeating what others say. For a project made by fans in their spare time, do you know enough people who use/work with Source as opposed to EU?

Stop whining without having a plausible argument about the engine.

eu is the whole problem with the fps, read the rest of the discussion before responding to it buddy

[٫Ꝛ꭫]

Originally posted by slim jim:

eu is the whole problem with the fps, read the rest of the discussion before responding to it buddy

It just needs polishing, I believe that this is one of the main reasons for releasing this tech demo, testing and gathering feedback for improvements. Once the FPS issue is resolved, I repeat:

What can be done in Source 2 that can't be done in UE?

[Mal0]

They cant switch to an engine that isnt available...

Also your FPS being bad on a 1660 isnt surprising, that's a fairly old budget GPU, while this games performance is bad your FPS being low is gonna happen regardless until you upgrade.

[Barney]

Originally posted by ٫Ꝛ꭫:

Originally posted by slim jim:

eu is the whole problem with the fps, read the rest of the discussion before responding to it buddy

It just needs polishing, I believe that this is one of the main reasons for releasing this tech demo, testing and gathering feedback for improvements. Once the FPS issue is resolved, I repeat:

What can be done in Source 2 that can't be done in UE?

why did you tell me to stop whining if you want them to have feedback? and also unreal games give me horrible fps and the unreal engine just feels slow and unresponsive

[Barney]

Originally posted by Mal0:

They cant switch to an engine that isnt available...

Also your FPS being bad on a 1660 isnt surprising, that's a fairly old budget GPU, while this games performance is bad your FPS being low is gonna happen regardless until you upgrade.

i've seen people complain about the fps on rtx graphics cards so my gpu isn't the only one that has low fps

[chuangtzu[ita]]

There are a million mods done in the source 2 engine.
For once that there's a original project trying to do something different...

[Barney]

Originally posted by chuangtzuita:

There are a million mods done in the source 2 engine.
For once that there's a original project trying to do something different...

a different engine means different game, got it

[٫Ꝛ꭫]

Originally posted by slim jim:

why did you tell me to stop whining if you want them to have feedback? and also unreal games give me horrible fps and the unreal engine just feels slow and unresponsive

What kind of feedback would be "switch it to Source 2 unreal is one of the worst engines out there"? What are the justifications? Talking just for the sake of it is not feedback, it's just whining. The FPS issue is just polish.

Not everyone is an expert in Valve's engine and the chance of contributors appearing is much higher in UE because of the many devs who use it, did you consider this when dealing with a game made by fans, without any big company behind it?

Also remembering that, when the project was started, Source 2 did not exist. But still, I ask one last time:

What can be done in Source 2 that can't be done in UE?

[かぐや]

Originally posted by ٫Ꝛ꭫:

Also remembering that, when the project was started, Source 2 did not exist.

It did.
Source 2 released in 2015. Still not available to use.
Epistle 3 was published in 2017.

[pyrsen]

i can tell you never touched unreal, just cause unreal games run poorly for you doesnt make the engine bad, games today run poorly regardless of the engine, using unreal is more efficent than source 2 especially with all the progress they'd have to redo

[Barney]

Originally posted by pyrsen:

i can tell you never touched unreal, just cause unreal games run poorly for you doesnt make the engine bad, games today run poorly regardless of the engine, using unreal is more efficent than source 2 especially with all the progress they'd have to redo

true but other people have complained about the fps so it isn't just me who is having problems with it

[CxlciumMMIV]

YOU'RE at fault for having a 1660 in 2024. most games require at the very least 8 gigs of vram. not 4.

[bafo300]

Originally posted by ٫Ꝛ꭫:

What can be done in Source 2 that can't be done in UE? You guys are picking on the engine without even knowing why, just a bunch of cattle repeating what others say. For a project made by fans in their spare time, do you know enough people who use/work with Source as opposed to UE?

Stop whining without having a plausible argument about the engine.

source 2 doesn't hurt my eyes

[Barney]

Originally posted by MMIVbanditcamp:

YOU'RE at fault for having a 1660 in 2024. most games require at the very least 8 gigs of vram. not 4.

maybe i don't want to spend 300 dollars for a giant graphics card i have no case for?