Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
just being hypocritical because it's western over japan.
we've had countless media from japan themselves calling yasuke a samurai, but it's only a problem because ubisoft does it i don't even like ubisoft games and i think this fake outrage is stupid.
ubisoft does everything for money they've not even hidden that fact. literally the same company that made the term "turning players into payers."
william adams. was also a real person. just like yasuke.
nioh one also has yasuke in it as a samurai. which i find hilarious how no one even cared. it's only bad because it's ubisoft and not made in japan.
Yeah but they didn't put asian there because he wouldn't looks American, Cause name of movie is "Captain America" it obvious that they pick Chris Evan as lead character not some asian attress like Leung Chiu-wai.
Now all these politic and DEI has everything mess up, what a world we living in.
Western companies don't do it for people. They are not doing it for fans. They are doing it for some crappy social engineering orgs. Still don't understand?
Japan appeals to customer. While west companies appeal to CEOs.
He wouldn't look any less american than an afro american and yet the latter was made into captain america.
And it's not obvious at all. It's just your own prejustice and persecution complex showing up.
Same way Japanese companies think there is money in sexualisation because of how sexually repressed people in there are.
My info is a bit dated by few years ago, their barely existant gaming devision was doing better than panchinko crap.
Which of course has everything to do with shareholders too, but don't you understand that the journey to destination is different? Or do you think that end justifies the means?
In one case, means include appealing to end customer. It's good for me as a customer.
In another case, means include appealing to social engineering org while ignoring end customer. It's not good for me as a customer.
If you still gonna say it's the same it means you agree that end justifies the means.
Where you are wrong is assuming Western companies appeal to SocioEn instead of customer. You are wrong here. They are using SocioEn debacle to appeal to customers who care about it, which they believe hold more profit.
Thus the simplest reasoning is that you are not the target audience.
It's kinda like scams. A lot of them are stupid, but some people still fall for them. It's because the people who don't are not the actual target audience of scammers.
There is his name is Zheng He