Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
this yap
giggle snort giggle
The same goes for wide screen resolutions. It'd be better if screens were to grant better resolutions in both directions, but it seems people only focus on the X axis rather than the also important Y axis. Instead with the focus on, "How wide can we make it" along with now curving the monitors, it's only a matter of time before people clamor for wide screens so wide that they leave your peripheral vision entirely.
But PC gamers would say it's such an advantage and they'd defend it to the death, when in reality... there's no advantage to that. Whether or not it's on the screen, if you can't see it... it's still a bloody blindspot.