安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
Most of the desktops are aligned toward a special distribution, like Cinnamon is a project of Linux Mint, so it will have the best overall integration level with that distribution and so are the others. You could run nearly every distribution with any kind of desktop, but if the developers don't provide a certain level of integration for your preferred desktop, then you have a hard time.
To come to the point, you make a ranking list of your desktops and try to attach that list to your preferred distributions. What will match is almost a compromise. There is no 'better' or 'worse', as it all depends on your preference lists.
I do actually use Garuda Linux, what is an Arch based distribution, they offer 5-6 different desktops, which they support. My most preferred desktops are not on that list (Deepin or Budgie) so I started to compare my list with the offered ones. Cinnamon is well known for good overall support and so I can use Cinnamon for my main computer with Garuda, but also for second computers with let's say Debian, Mint, Manjaro and don't have to worry about the desktop and how-to's.
That said, back to your real question:
Cinnamon would be my preferred from your list. It's nice, fast and works on nearly every distribution.
Mate is fine, but from my view it has less option for fine-tuning or it is costlier to fix it, plus it isn't offered for all distributions.
Xface is slim and fast and doesn't need too much resources to work. It would be my choice out of the three, if it comes toward older computers or less powerful laptops.
Cinnamon and Mate are both based on Gnome, or are a fork of earlier versions, while a lot of distributions prefer KDE instead. Xface is a choice of need/use from my perspective, but others might disagree.
As for technical differences, you should search the net. There area a few comparisons out there.
less issues. but even then some game or even steam app can have issues with openbox. you'll never know which DE is the safest bet because none is prone to bugs and incompatibilities when using 3d party apps like steam.
all DEs are the same, just different looks and different menus.
I believe that with Linux, you are best overcoming the paralysis of too many options and not caring about if you made the "right" choice as the "right" choice can only be made by you for your use-case. One thing you can do to make your life easier is to pick a popular distro because there will be more people that can offer help. I use Ubuntu because Valve officially supports it and it was my first experience.
i can see how they look different, but i want to know what i can and cant do with each version, and what makes them functionally different
https://itsfoss.com/linux-mint-cinnamon-mate-xfce/